Please note, a human psychology professional doing this is a violation of their code of ethics and would have been grounds for blacklisting fifteen years ago.
All AI output is daydreaming. It's all intuition and absolutely no reason or analysis. ChatGPT cannot solve extremely easy novel puzzles. It couldn't correctly answer the question, "if you have a green ball and a purple cube and I ask you to hand me the cube what is the color of the object you should hand me." After the hype has settled down I'm sure we'll find the we aren't any closer to general artificial intelligence.
There are chess and go AIs that can beat the best human players. You want a ChatGPT AI to perform tasks it has yet to familiarize itself with. Once it gets going, it'll be better than you in sorting colors. That doesn't make it general artificial intelligence, but it's still a pretty significant threat.
Please note, a human psychology professional doing this is a violation of their code of ethics and would have been grounds for blacklisting fifteen years ago.
Also that. AI literally can't do anything. I sat through an AI threat analysis for work last week and the demonstrations were genuinely pathetic.
All AI output is daydreaming. It's all intuition and absolutely no reason or analysis. ChatGPT cannot solve extremely easy novel puzzles. It couldn't correctly answer the question, "if you have a green ball and a purple cube and I ask you to hand me the cube what is the color of the object you should hand me." After the hype has settled down I'm sure we'll find the we aren't any closer to general artificial intelligence.
There are chess and go AIs that can beat the best human players. You want a ChatGPT AI to perform tasks it has yet to familiarize itself with. Once it gets going, it'll be better than you in sorting colors. That doesn't make it general artificial intelligence, but it's still a pretty significant threat.