There are chess and go AIs that can beat the best human players. You want a ChatGPT AI to perform tasks it has yet to familiarize itself with. Once it gets going, it'll be better than you in sorting colors. That doesn't make it general artificial intelligence, but it's still a pretty significant threat.
The point is there's a difference between being smart and knowing a lot. ChatGPT knows a lot but is dumb as a rock, but most people can't tell the difference so they're more excited than they should be.
I think the main threat from AI is man-made censorship, and subtle "view programming" and gaslighting of humans, much like how Google's search is designed to result in the user leaving with a certain viewpoint.
People figured out how to beat the go AI as the AI didn't understand what a piece meant. So strategies that a human would see instantly were foreign to the AI and it lost consistently to that strategy
There are chess and go AIs that can beat the best human players. You want a ChatGPT AI to perform tasks it has yet to familiarize itself with. Once it gets going, it'll be better than you in sorting colors. That doesn't make it general artificial intelligence, but it's still a pretty significant threat.
The point is there's a difference between being smart and knowing a lot. ChatGPT knows a lot but is dumb as a rock, but most people can't tell the difference so they're more excited than they should be.
I think the main threat from AI is man-made censorship, and subtle "view programming" and gaslighting of humans, much like how Google's search is designed to result in the user leaving with a certain viewpoint.
People figured out how to beat the go AI as the AI didn't understand what a piece meant. So strategies that a human would see instantly were foreign to the AI and it lost consistently to that strategy