a position which he used to lock out & demonize proto-paleocon groups like the John Birch Society as I have said
And good riddance, because they were crazy people.
On the other hand, he got the neocon infestation going by inviting 'ex'-Trotskyists like James Burnham (a man whose Machiavellian idea about the emergence of a dominant managerial elite inspired the character of O'Brien in 1984, all Orwell was missing was Burnham's suggestion that such an elite continue to keep some democratic trappings like a token opposition and a 'controlled circulation of the élites' to better manage dissent...
He diagnosed the managerial revolution and Machiavellianism. It doesn't mean he cheered it on. I've enjoyed Burnham's books very much, and they expose modern 'democracies' for what they are: phony democracies.
Israel worship to the detriment of any points of relevance to the American situation
How does support for Israel hurt the right?
Conservatism being liberalism driving the speed limit, essentially the manager of decline for the right's 'managed decline'?
That is the same everywhere. You blame Buckley for it, but that assumes that things would be better with no Buckley. European countries had no Buckleys, and we may be even bigger shitholes.
Nine months after his death, his own son Christopher not only voted for Obama, but felt the need to publicly announce he did so in the pages of the National Review.
It's funny how those same people now say they just hate Trump and would love 'old-style' Republicans like Romney and McCain.
And good riddance, because they were crazy people.
JBS more closely aligned with the values of regular Americans post-WW2 than William Buckley and National Review did. I guess don't react too much against subversives to maintain your culture or you're "cRaZy".
Maybe you're not intending to channel elitist politicians when they call half of America bigoted deplorables and wingnuts, but that's what you're saying.
Didn't they claim that Eisenhower was an agent of communism? It's just dumb. I don't think the average person who elected Eisenhower believed that. They were nutcases, and all the attempted (incorrect) rehabilitation of McCarthy isn't going to change that.
And good riddance, because they were crazy people.
He diagnosed the managerial revolution and Machiavellianism. It doesn't mean he cheered it on. I've enjoyed Burnham's books very much, and they expose modern 'democracies' for what they are: phony democracies.
How does support for Israel hurt the right?
That is the same everywhere. You blame Buckley for it, but that assumes that things would be better with no Buckley. European countries had no Buckleys, and we may be even bigger shitholes.
It's funny how those same people now say they just hate Trump and would love 'old-style' Republicans like Romney and McCain.
I defy you to show me where JBS was wrong.
JBS more closely aligned with the values of regular Americans post-WW2 than William Buckley and National Review did. I guess don't react too much against subversives to maintain your culture or you're "cRaZy".
Maybe you're not intending to channel elitist politicians when they call half of America bigoted deplorables and wingnuts, but that's what you're saying.
Didn't they claim that Eisenhower was an agent of communism? It's just dumb. I don't think the average person who elected Eisenhower believed that. They were nutcases, and all the attempted (incorrect) rehabilitation of McCarthy isn't going to change that.