Reminder on why the left wins and conservatives are born and bred to lose
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (118)
sorted by:
So what, unload your gun and give that to them instead?
Not evey judge is compromised, but they can't do anything if you don't give them some wiggle room. Just be smart about it, aim for omission or "misunderstanding" rather than provable falsehood, work in enough plausible deniability and keep your mouth shut, don't be a retard like the George Floyd activist and brag about it to your friends, ever, take it to your grave. At worst you'll be deemed ineligible for the jury like that, but most likely you'll be fine and be one of the rare ones able to actually be able to do something useful for a change.
Engage in subversion damnit.
Lies can get you violently dragged in court, and a Leftist DA or Judge is going to look for an excuse to "send a message". So that when you do actually violate the law, you're going to get your asshole ripped open with over-zealous prosecution.
Subversion practically requires lying, at least in intentions, not lying is either cooperation or direct antagonism.
If you're waiting for a 100% perfect chance to fall into your lap, you're just going to twiddle your thumbs as you get inescapably boxed in. We'd be better off if everyone took a guarded swing when you get a 90% chance like jury duty.
Like I said, stick to omitting things you're not directly questioned on and bending definitions and you're almost impossible to do anything to in a criminal court unless you stupidly confess to what you're doing, keep your mouth shut and it's a low risk prospect. If your interrogation is thorough enough that you can't get by without omitting something you're directly questioned about, don't do it, answer the direct question honestly and call yourself unlucky as you become ineligible but otherwise suffer no consequences.
American, and more broadly Western, society currently heavily favors opportunism and being the first to try and take advantage of a situation. You probe with plausibly innocent transgressions, if they're on guard you'll just get a harmless warning and you can just keep testing others until someone's guard finally is down and you know you have the advantage before you start. Many lefty activists know this, that's why they often appear so limp wristed or spineless, they're always testing the water and are happy to back down from an unadvantageous confrontation before the stakes rise, so they can keep looking for someone with their back turned to strike at instead.
So start poking cracks and testing unguarded doors yourselves, it's the most advantageous strategy until something changes and society as a whole stops being so placid and starts being more vengeful.
Subversion does not require lying. It simply requires patience, persistence, and recognizing opportunities. I'm not saying that you wait for a 100% chance, I'm saying you don't lie, which could involve serious legal actions, and blowing up the trail.
To subvert you first have to pretend to agree with the people you intend to try and change from within. If you're not lying you're not subverting, you're just open opposition.
And I'm saying if you can lie smart, where there is negligible chance of serious repercussions, then do it. If you want them to wait until there's no chance of repercussions at all, that would be what I consider waiting for a 100% chance.