The highest value on the heatmap scale is 20 units for liberals, and 12 units for conservatives. Moral circle rings, from inner to outer, are described as follows: (1) all of your immediate family, (2) all of your extended family, (3) all of your closest friends, (4) all of your friends (including distant ones), (5) all of your acquaintances, (6) all people you have ever met, (7) all people in your country, (8) all people on your continent, (9) all people on all continents, (10) all mammals, (11) all amphibians, reptiles, mammals, fish, and birds, (12) all animals on earth including paramecia and amoebae, (13) all animals in the universe, including alien lifeforms, (14) all living things in the universe including plants and trees, (15) all natural things in the universe including inert entities such as rocks, (16) all things in existence
Holy shit. Libshits assign the highest value to this region:
(12) all animals on earth including paramecia and amoebae, (13) all animals in the universe, including alien lifeforms, (14) all living things in the universe including plants and trees, (15) all natural things in the universe including inert entities such as rocks
Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.
— Professor Theodore Kaczynski, PhD, 1967 winner of the Sumner B. Myers Prize for Michigan's best mathematics dissertation of the year
Random background information:
In his second year at Harvard, Kaczynski participated in a study described by author Alston Chase as a "purposely brutalizing psychological experiment" led by Harvard psychologist Henry Murray. Subjects were told they would debate personal philosophy with a fellow student and were asked to write essays detailing their personal beliefs and aspirations. The essays were given to an anonymous individual who would confront and belittle the subject in what Murray himself called "vehement, sweeping, and personally abusive" attacks, using the content of the essays as ammunition. Electrodes monitored the subject's physiological reactions. These encounters were filmed, and subjects' expressions of anger and rage were later played back to them repeatedly. The experiment lasted three years, with someone verbally abusing and humiliating Kaczynski each week. Kaczynski spent 200 hours as part of the study.
20 points vs 12 points is the "heat" scale, i.e., the higher the redder, or how much people value the objects at that distance. Libs value rocks more than conservatives value family. The scale that goes from 1-16 is the "distance" from the center (1), which is "family", out to the outer edge (16), which is "all things in existence".
Source on his heatmap pic in the 1st post: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Heatmaps-indicating-highest-moral-allocation-by-ideology-Study-3a-Source-data-are_fig6_336076674
Holy shit. Libshits assign the highest value to this region:
Over people they know.
It's an ideology of hate, plain and simple
— Professor Theodore Kaczynski, PhD, 1967 winner of the Sumner B. Myers Prize for Michigan's best mathematics dissertation of the year
Random background information:
Weren't the conductors of that expierement also feds?
The Iron Law of Woke Projection never fails.
This is great. Posts like Pascal's deserve way more hearts and updoots.
Archive: https://archive.is/yJ7jT
I’m having trouble understanding this. How does one arrive at a specific number? What does highest moral allocation mean?
Also how does a liberal hit 20 units when 16 is the highest value?
The dumbass should've screenshotted the graph's caption: https://iili.io/HSUZFDP.jpg
20 points vs 12 points is the "heat" scale, i.e., the higher the redder, or how much people value the objects at that distance. Libs value rocks more than conservatives value family. The scale that goes from 1-16 is the "distance" from the center (1), which is "family", out to the outer edge (16), which is "all things in existence".