“We have always been focused on ensuring that LEGO play was for all children, but within the recent years we have focused more on putting systematic processes into place to ensure LEGO products and marketing be as inclusive as possible,” said Julia Goldin, Chief Product and Marketing Officer Lego Group, in a statement to USA TODAY.
It’s always women pushing this crap
A global survey commissioned by the Lego Group in October 2021 found that attitudes regarding children’s activities and future goals continue to be unequal and constrained by gender biases, prompting the company to announce the production of gender-neutral toys.
We have to social engineer kids because they actually act according to inherent biological development!
But girls expressed this stronger than boys. For example, 82% of girls agreed that girls can play football and boys can practice ballet, compared to 71% of boys. And 42% of girls said they worry about being made fun of for playing with a toy typically associated for the other gender, compared to 71% of boys — a fear often shared by parents.
Righttt because women totally “play football”! Imagine paying for this survey that doesn’t actually help sell toys.
“Girls are more likely to consider a wider range of jobs versus boys,” Madeline Di Nonno, president and CEO of the Geena Davis Institute, told USA TODAY. “The girls are ready, we just have to get out of the way
As always it’s about propping up women in spite of men.
“We measure and report on the progress on the share of women globally and set annual targets for share of women at Director level and above, i.e women in executive positions.”
It also states, “Diversity is the visible and invisible dimensions that make each of us unique. We want our organization to reflect the diversity of the world we operate in and seek to inspire. Currently we focus on gender, ethnicity, LGBTQIA+ communities and people with disabilities.”
Feminism created the troon cult, remember that everytime you see Riley Gaines crying about strong men while also propping feminism.
But girls expressed this stronger than boys. For example, 82% of girls agreed that girls can play football and boys can practice ballet, compared to 71% of boys. And 42% of girls said they worry about being made fun of for playing with a toy typically associated for the other gender, compared to 71% of boys — a fear often shared by parents.
There's a very simple reason for this: Maleness is superior.
When a girl plays with boys toys, it's a sign of a superior quality.
When a boy plays with girl's, toys, it's a sign of an inferior quality.
That's far too reductionist. All kid's toys are shit-tier quality, because kid's don't even know what they are really looking at.
Little Girls are groomed from very early age that they should defy any sort of gender conformity whenever possible in order to defeat boys.
Little Boys are groomed from a very early age to understand they are innately inferior and only belong in specific places, away from women and girls, where they can do the least harm.
Then there is the actual biological drivers operating underneath where boys want to protect their extremely limited social status which could be damaged by femininity (which fits in with the intentional self-segregation narrative from society). Similarly, girls will be pre-disposed to engage in feminine social signaling, but have no restrictions preventing them from engaging with masculine signals, and may also be rewarded for doing so. That way, when they simply give up on masculine symbols or behaviors, there is no loss to their social status at all.
Then, after ALL of that, there is the Feminist narrative that masculinity is innately powerful. And, as such, to redistribute power from men to women, men must be equitably disempowered and feminized; and women must attach themselves to masculine power to be empowered.
This is the very nature of the insane title of that movie: "The Woman King". The Feminist dialectic presumes that all power is monopolized among men, therefore seizing the term king (rather than identifying a person as a strong queen) is necessary.
Well, you've convinced me. Only the highest quality product come from Lego. What idiot would buy something as unreliable as a car? I know for a fact that legos are far more sophisticated than my automatic transmission. That's why, when I was 4, I bought my first micrometer. You know, to make sure the legos were up to specs. You certainly wouldn't need that for your spark plugs.
Little boys are groomed from a very early age to understand they are innately inferior and only belong in specific places, away from women and girls, where they can do the least harm.
By who? Until society admits it, we're getting nowhere.
By their teachers, by their parents, by television, by their friends, by social media, by traditional media, by punditry, by entertainment, by infotainment.
Seriously, how would you of all people not notice this? This is like that time you though Spain wasn't as bad as the US in regards to Feminism. Pro Tip: Amber Herd moved there.
We measure and report on the progress on the share of women globally and set annual targets for share of women at Director level and above, i.e women in executive positions.”
Reparations for men are 100% necessary to consider any form of truce.
It’s always women pushing this crap
We have to social engineer kids because they actually act according to inherent biological development!
Righttt because women totally “play football”! Imagine paying for this survey that doesn’t actually help sell toys.
As always it’s about propping up women in spite of men.
Feminism created the troon cult, remember that everytime you see Riley Gaines crying about strong men while also propping feminism.
There's a very simple reason for this: Maleness is superior.
When a girl plays with boys toys, it's a sign of a superior quality.
When a boy plays with girl's, toys, it's a sign of an inferior quality.
Everyone understands this inherently.
That's far too reductionist. All kid's toys are shit-tier quality, because kid's don't even know what they are really looking at.
Little Girls are groomed from very early age that they should defy any sort of gender conformity whenever possible in order to defeat boys.
Little Boys are groomed from a very early age to understand they are innately inferior and only belong in specific places, away from women and girls, where they can do the least harm.
Then there is the actual biological drivers operating underneath where boys want to protect their extremely limited social status which could be damaged by femininity (which fits in with the intentional self-segregation narrative from society). Similarly, girls will be pre-disposed to engage in feminine social signaling, but have no restrictions preventing them from engaging with masculine signals, and may also be rewarded for doing so. That way, when they simply give up on masculine symbols or behaviors, there is no loss to their social status at all.
Then, after ALL of that, there is the Feminist narrative that masculinity is innately powerful. And, as such, to redistribute power from men to women, men must be equitably disempowered and feminized; and women must attach themselves to masculine power to be empowered.
This is the very nature of the insane title of that movie: "The Woman King". The Feminist dialectic presumes that all power is monopolized among men, therefore seizing the term king (rather than identifying a person as a strong queen) is necessary.
I'm not referring to the quality of the toys, I'm referring the quality of the human being playing with them.
Either way:
Lego is literally precision engineered to tolerances smaller than many parts of your car.
"the literal square has tight tolerances"
Well, you've convinced me. Only the highest quality product come from Lego. What idiot would buy something as unreliable as a car? I know for a fact that legos are far more sophisticated than my automatic transmission. That's why, when I was 4, I bought my first micrometer. You know, to make sure the legos were up to specs. You certainly wouldn't need that for your spark plugs.
By who? Until society admits it, we're getting nowhere.
By their teachers, by their parents, by television, by their friends, by social media, by traditional media, by punditry, by entertainment, by infotainment.
Seriously, how would you of all people not notice this? This is like that time you though Spain wasn't as bad as the US in regards to Feminism. Pro Tip: Amber Herd moved there.
Who indeed....
So, gender neutral means feminize boys.
What they mean is that they're going to push the boys out of the way.
Reparations for men are 100% necessary to consider any form of truce.
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This actually doesn't do that
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTF_XVspfDM&list=PLWHTKnB0jqZD9cR0zMpNLCvNeqf2UlfIB
Forget that. Remember "Dear Colleague".
They're playing games, they're going to push a "bi-partisan reform" by putting women's sports trash and woman-led campus rape courts together.