Without any money changing hands? Maybe. That is the furthest I maaaay think is okay.
The moment money is involved, it becomes human trading and I am against that. You can't purchase a human being. You can't order a child being made for yourself.
(I'm also disgusted by the people doing the buying when they pretend they are so nice for paying. Like ooooh, the woman "profits so much, it's such a good deal for here, we are good because she is being compensated". Not how this works.)
Surrogacy should be a last resort for people who can't otherwise conceive and the only information that matters should be the lack of genetic diseases
Without any money changing hands? Maybe. That is the furthest I maaaay think is okay.
The moment money is involved, it becomes human trading and I am against that. You can't purchase a human being. You can't order a child being made for yourself.
(I'm also disgusted by the people doing the buying when they pretend they are so nice for paying. Like ooooh, the woman "profits so much, it's such a good deal for here, we are good because she is being compensated". Not how this works.)
In normal peoples surrogacy it's a volunteer with the medical bills being paid by the people requesting the surrogacy.
Only weird rich elites get to "order" a baby
Why is it a matter of significance that some people can't conceive? Deal with it the way people throughout all of human history did.
It's as if people think that having children is some sort of human right, just like avoiding them is a human right.
Because humans use science to overcome nature you weirdo.
Good of you to come out in support of 'gender affirming care'.
Classic lefty tactic right here. Taking a normal situation and saying that you must also support this insane thing.
That's like saying that the fact that a double mastectomy is the last resort for breast cancer means "YoU SuPpORt GeNdER AfFiRmInG CaRe"