the right man with the right words can rile a million guns into action
speech IS warfare, and refusing to engage in it to uphold a principle that lived and died with a single constitution in history, written by and for people that are not half as evil as who we're dealing with right now, is just ensuring you end up on the losing side.
written by and for people that are not half as evil as who we're dealing with right now, is just ensuring you end up on the losing side
I'm not sure entirely what you're advocating, but there's some merit to the thought that tactics based on principles and "treat others like you want to be treated" do not work against the "no bad tactics" feminist regime.
That's probably the idea behind it, but its use hasn't been explained well to most of the children who first hear it to begin with.
As such, most people grow up agreeing with it thinking "yeah if I was a Nazi I'd want to be treated like shit because I'd know I'm evil, so this is fine."
the right man with the right words can rile a million guns into action
speech IS warfare, and refusing to engage in it to uphold a principle that lived and died with a single constitution in history, written by and for people that are not half as evil as who we're dealing with right now, is just ensuring you end up on the losing side.
I'm not sure entirely what you're advocating, but there's some merit to the thought that tactics based on principles and "treat others like you want to be treated" do not work against the "no bad tactics" feminist regime.
The treat others how you wish to be treated is used as an example to remind certain people about the definition of mercy.
That's probably the idea behind it, but its use hasn't been explained well to most of the children who first hear it to begin with.
As such, most people grow up agreeing with it thinking "yeah if I was a Nazi I'd want to be treated like shit because I'd know I'm evil, so this is fine."