By that logic, all the media outlets that pushed "Russian collusion" and finally admitted it was BS when Mueller couldn't fabricate enough evidence are now good guys. You tell the truth on the day or you issue a prominent retraction the day after, admitting you were wrong. You don't come a few weeks later and pretend you told the truth.
The fact that you immediately got it removed proves the truth of the allegations. Of course, that also explains why you defend the Rotherham child rapists, and why you attack Kyle Rittenhouse (who shot a pedo).
Let's go slowly with this. I'll assume you actually saw something, even though I'm 99.9% sure you're making it up for a bizarre point. First of all, women's allegations are literally worthless, a political weapon that has about as much likelihood of being correct as a dog's attempt at long division. Second of all, a woman was arrested and jailed for faking a grooming gang story. That woman was backed by the same person who "exposed Rotherham", Tommy Robinson. Finally, I didn't attack Rittenhouse, I attacked his grifter girlfriend.
all the media outlets that pushed "Russian collusion" and finally admitted it was BS when Mueller couldn't fabricate enough evidence are now good guys.
That wasn't your argument. Your claim was that it was never mentioned. You were wrong. You apparently have less of a moral compass than those media outlets that did admit that they spread BS, because you won't even do that.
You don't come a few weeks later and pretend you told the truth.
Which is what you just did.
women's allegations are literally worthless, a political weapon that has about as much likelihood of being correct as a dog's attempt at long division. Second of all, a woman was arrested and jailed for faking a grooming gang story
Yup, you're totally in the tank for the grooming gang, which only solidifies suspicions that you are a pedophile.
Finally, I didn't attack Rittenhouse, I attacked his grifter girlfriend.
See, you're a lying piece of shit. You claimed this without any evidence, and claimed that he received a "huge payout". When asked for evidence of this payout, you disappeared, and ignored the dozens of times you were called out for it.
You're arguing a pathetic technicality, purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Right, facts are now anti-woman. It's hard to keep track of all the things that are offensive to them. Are we still allowed to breathe, or is that anti-woman too? Actually, don't answer that.
I'm arguing your actual claim, which was false, rather than the position to which you want to retreat now.
purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Well, you are also evil, a good deal more so than JK Rowling (about whom you also lied), and there's no 'we' for you.
Right, facts are now anti-woman
Nope, you are pro-grooming gang. You've been called out many times for this, and this is why you have been referred to as a suspected pedophile. This is in fact a good deal more evidence than on whose basis you call others that, so there is absolutely no grounds on which you can object to that.
Are we still allowed to breathe
Given your prospects for imminent heart failure, due to the damage you inflict on yourself, it may not matter for you.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
I don't think it's possible to be more evil than Rowling without actually committing a crime. Don't forget her best buddy, the female murderer advocate!
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
By that logic, all the media outlets that pushed "Russian collusion" and finally admitted it was BS when Mueller couldn't fabricate enough evidence are now good guys. You tell the truth on the day or you issue a prominent retraction the day after, admitting you were wrong. You don't come a few weeks later and pretend you told the truth.
Let's go slowly with this. I'll assume you actually saw something, even though I'm 99.9% sure you're making it up for a bizarre point. First of all, women's allegations are literally worthless, a political weapon that has about as much likelihood of being correct as a dog's attempt at long division. Second of all, a woman was arrested and jailed for faking a grooming gang story. That woman was backed by the same person who "exposed Rotherham", Tommy Robinson. Finally, I didn't attack Rittenhouse, I attacked his grifter girlfriend.
That wasn't your argument. Your claim was that it was never mentioned. You were wrong. You apparently have less of a moral compass than those media outlets that did admit that they spread BS, because you won't even do that.
Which is what you just did.
Yup, you're totally in the tank for the grooming gang, which only solidifies suspicions that you are a pedophile.
See, you're a lying piece of shit. You claimed this without any evidence, and claimed that he received a "huge payout". When asked for evidence of this payout, you disappeared, and ignored the dozens of times you were called out for it.
You're arguing a pathetic technicality, purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Right, facts are now anti-woman. It's hard to keep track of all the things that are offensive to them. Are we still allowed to breathe, or is that anti-woman too? Actually, don't answer that.
I'm arguing your actual claim, which was false, rather than the position to which you want to retreat now.
Well, you are also evil, a good deal more so than JK Rowling (about whom you also lied), and there's no 'we' for you.
Nope, you are pro-grooming gang. You've been called out many times for this, and this is why you have been referred to as a suspected pedophile. This is in fact a good deal more evidence than on whose basis you call others that, so there is absolutely no grounds on which you can object to that.
Given your prospects for imminent heart failure, due to the damage you inflict on yourself, it may not matter for you.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
I don't think it's possible to be more evil than Rowling without actually committing a crime. Don't forget her best buddy, the female murderer advocate!
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.