I'm arguing your actual claim, which was false, rather than the position to which you want to retreat now.
purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Well, you are also evil, a good deal more so than JK Rowling (about whom you also lied), and there's no 'we' for you.
Right, facts are now anti-woman
Nope, you are pro-grooming gang. You've been called out many times for this, and this is why you have been referred to as a suspected pedophile. This is in fact a good deal more evidence than on whose basis you call others that, so there is absolutely no grounds on which you can object to that.
Are we still allowed to breathe
Given your prospects for imminent heart failure, due to the damage you inflict on yourself, it may not matter for you.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
I don't think it's possible to be more evil than Rowling without actually committing a crime. Don't forget her best buddy, the female murderer advocate!
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
You're not even admitting that you lied about your claim, and are desperately trying to divert from it still.
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
I'm an anti-lying bitch, which is why I'm anti-you. You 'established' by a court that one woman lied, and using that, you're trying to defend your beloved grooming gangs, because you are a...
I don't think he's either a pedophile, or a Muslim (as the Rotherham gang was all Muslims, I just think it's another one of the dozens of times that a woman (or women in that case) falsely accused a group of men of sexually assaulting her/them. It isn't a fabrication, but considering how many incidents turn out to be fake, I get how he comes to that conclusion.
I'm arguing your actual claim, which was false, rather than the position to which you want to retreat now.
Well, you are also evil, a good deal more so than JK Rowling (about whom you also lied), and there's no 'we' for you.
Nope, you are pro-grooming gang. You've been called out many times for this, and this is why you have been referred to as a suspected pedophile. This is in fact a good deal more evidence than on whose basis you call others that, so there is absolutely no grounds on which you can object to that.
Given your prospects for imminent heart failure, due to the damage you inflict on yourself, it may not matter for you.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
I don't think it's possible to be more evil than Rowling without actually committing a crime. Don't forget her best buddy, the female murderer advocate!
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
You're not even admitting that you lied about your claim, and are desperately trying to divert from it still.
I'm an anti-lying bitch, which is why I'm anti-you. You 'established' by a court that one woman lied, and using that, you're trying to defend your beloved grooming gangs, because you are a...
I don't think he's either a pedophile, or a Muslim (as the Rotherham gang was all Muslims, I just think it's another one of the dozens of times that a woman (or women in that case) falsely accused a group of men of sexually assaulting her/them. It isn't a fabrication, but considering how many incidents turn out to be fake, I get how he comes to that conclusion.