all the media outlets that pushed "Russian collusion" and finally admitted it was BS when Mueller couldn't fabricate enough evidence are now good guys.
That wasn't your argument. Your claim was that it was never mentioned. You were wrong. You apparently have less of a moral compass than those media outlets that did admit that they spread BS, because you won't even do that.
You don't come a few weeks later and pretend you told the truth.
Which is what you just did.
women's allegations are literally worthless, a political weapon that has about as much likelihood of being correct as a dog's attempt at long division. Second of all, a woman was arrested and jailed for faking a grooming gang story
Yup, you're totally in the tank for the grooming gang, which only solidifies suspicions that you are a pedophile.
Finally, I didn't attack Rittenhouse, I attacked his grifter girlfriend.
See, you're a lying piece of shit. You claimed this without any evidence, and claimed that he received a "huge payout". When asked for evidence of this payout, you disappeared, and ignored the dozens of times you were called out for it.
You're arguing a pathetic technicality, purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Right, facts are now anti-woman. It's hard to keep track of all the things that are offensive to them. Are we still allowed to breathe, or is that anti-woman too? Actually, don't answer that.
I'm arguing your actual claim, which was false, rather than the position to which you want to retreat now.
purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Well, you are also evil, a good deal more so than JK Rowling (about whom you also lied), and there's no 'we' for you.
Right, facts are now anti-woman
Nope, you are pro-grooming gang. You've been called out many times for this, and this is why you have been referred to as a suspected pedophile. This is in fact a good deal more evidence than on whose basis you call others that, so there is absolutely no grounds on which you can object to that.
Are we still allowed to breathe
Given your prospects for imminent heart failure, due to the damage you inflict on yourself, it may not matter for you.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
I don't think it's possible to be more evil than Rowling without actually committing a crime. Don't forget her best buddy, the female murderer advocate!
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
You're not even admitting that you lied about your claim, and are desperately trying to divert from it still.
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
I'm an anti-lying bitch, which is why I'm anti-you. You 'established' by a court that one woman lied, and using that, you're trying to defend your beloved grooming gangs, because you are a...
That wasn't your argument. Your claim was that it was never mentioned. You were wrong. You apparently have less of a moral compass than those media outlets that did admit that they spread BS, because you won't even do that.
Which is what you just did.
Yup, you're totally in the tank for the grooming gang, which only solidifies suspicions that you are a pedophile.
See, you're a lying piece of shit. You claimed this without any evidence, and claimed that he received a "huge payout". When asked for evidence of this payout, you disappeared, and ignored the dozens of times you were called out for it.
You're arguing a pathetic technicality, purely because you can't admit TERFs are evil people and we need to get the fuck away from them.
Right, facts are now anti-woman. It's hard to keep track of all the things that are offensive to them. Are we still allowed to breathe, or is that anti-woman too? Actually, don't answer that.
I'm arguing your actual claim, which was false, rather than the position to which you want to retreat now.
Well, you are also evil, a good deal more so than JK Rowling (about whom you also lied), and there's no 'we' for you.
Nope, you are pro-grooming gang. You've been called out many times for this, and this is why you have been referred to as a suspected pedophile. This is in fact a good deal more evidence than on whose basis you call others that, so there is absolutely no grounds on which you can object to that.
Given your prospects for imminent heart failure, due to the damage you inflict on yourself, it may not matter for you.
You sound like a leftist arguing that the media isn't biased because they admitted the right was correct months after it mattered.
I don't think it's possible to be more evil than Rowling without actually committing a crime. Don't forget her best buddy, the female murderer advocate!
So are you pro-lying bitch? Because it's already been established by a court that the woman lied.
You're not even admitting that you lied about your claim, and are desperately trying to divert from it still.
I'm an anti-lying bitch, which is why I'm anti-you. You 'established' by a court that one woman lied, and using that, you're trying to defend your beloved grooming gangs, because you are a...