Yeah, just ignore shit like that law recently passed in Washington
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Because the few hundred cases from across the country where parents disowned their kids for being gay, all went to Santa Fe and New York, or Trinidad, CO in the case of trannies, and founded their culture on that experience.
A gay child is a dead end on the heritage branch, usually. They should not be included in any will or property transfer.
Why is this upvoted?
It's not a complex or difficult concept.
Gay child = no reproduction = no genetic legacy/heritage.
Then again you're an anti-natalist so obviously it's not worth actually having this conversation.
So if your daughter is born infertile, you'd throw her out of your will?
Bullshit. It's got nothing to do with fertility, that's just an excuse.