Can we please stop mixing fiction with reality? i remember the days when one one cared about loli at all. Now in the last few years people started getting all up and arms about it to hysterical degrees and keep trying to mix up fictional things with real things .
Not only that but the CPfags hate loli in the first place. They think its just horribly unfair that loli is legal and their fucked up child abuse fetish isn't. Whenever negative attention like OP gets brought down on the lolifag community, the pedos and troons start salivating. People need to quit fucking helping them.
Not only that but the CPfags hate loli in the first place. They think its just horribly unfair that loli is legal and their fucked up child abuse fetish isn't.
Correct. We a similar reaction to 'futanari' - It is wildly popular in erotic art, but that huge popularity doesn't translate into even remotely comparable popularity for pre-op trannies, or women wearing strap-ons (possibly even less popular than trannies? Not sure), because the drawn (or even 3D rendered) image is fundamentally different to the reality of supposed real world equivalent.
This difference in reactions gets troons so salty that they often turn against the term 'futanari' and call it a slur out of, essentially, jealousy.
I know lots of guys who'd pay me $200 to draw a girl with fifteen inch cock and a nut sack the size of their skull, to whom the average troon is a disgusting uggo, and the average woman with a strap-on is a pale imitation. They'll fantasize about cartoon futa cock, but they'd never a touch another real dick in a million years because it's just fundamentally not the same thing as the illusion created by artists.
it's creepy how many replies I'm getting from people ITT trying to defend lolicons.
I'm not trying to 'defend lolicons', I'm trying to defend reality. You have an opinion that I am 100% certain is simply at odds with the objective reality of the situation. I vociferously attack all objectively wrong opinions regardless of what side of current politics they appear on, because I prize objectivity.
How the fuck would you know? Are you a lolicon? Do you have lots of lolicon friends?
I know because I am an erotic artist. I don't produce lolicon - far from it - but I do draw things things that don't really resemble anything real. I draw them in a way that is beyond reality, and I venture into finding shapes that makes people's brains light up. I am essentially producing visual patterns that don't exist in nature, and short-circuit brains that have evolved in nature. I'm hacking the brain.
It is to be completely expected, then, that the images I produce will generate feelings of attraction where a real life approximation of the subject would not. One such case is fat women. You can draw fat women so beautiful - it's easy. The brain loves big, bouncy round shapes. She can have flawless skin, her rolls (if there are any) can be golden ratio'd in their distribution, she can have a skinny neck an firm under-arms, her facial structure need not be buried under blubber, her ankles need not be cankles, her thighs can be massive and yet not deform or overhang her knees. I can draw a 450lb blob and make her look good. Reality can't do that.
I saw a nude photograph of Lizzo this week, and she looked repulsive. I could draw a cartoon of her and make her beautiful, but guess what? It wouldn't be her no matter how much I said it was, and any boner generated by it would be unlikely to equate to a boner for the flesh and blood bridge troll that is Lizzo.
Can we please stop mixing fiction with reality? i remember the days when one one cared about loli at all. Now in the last few years people started getting all up and arms about it to hysterical degrees and keep trying to mix up fictional things with real things .
Everyone knows lolis are not real CP.
Everyone also knows that if lolis make your dick hard & you masturbate to them, you're a pedo.
You need a reality check.
99% of loli enjoyers would nope the fuck out if you showed them real CP.
Not only that but the CPfags hate loli in the first place. They think its just horribly unfair that loli is legal and their fucked up child abuse fetish isn't. Whenever negative attention like OP gets brought down on the lolifag community, the pedos and troons start salivating. People need to quit fucking helping them.
Correct. We a similar reaction to 'futanari' - It is wildly popular in erotic art, but that huge popularity doesn't translate into even remotely comparable popularity for pre-op trannies, or women wearing strap-ons (possibly even less popular than trannies? Not sure), because the drawn (or even 3D rendered) image is fundamentally different to the reality of supposed real world equivalent.
This difference in reactions gets troons so salty that they often turn against the term 'futanari' and call it a slur out of, essentially, jealousy.
I know lots of guys who'd pay me $200 to draw a girl with fifteen inch cock and a nut sack the size of their skull, to whom the average troon is a disgusting uggo, and the average woman with a strap-on is a pale imitation. They'll fantasize about cartoon futa cock, but they'd never a touch another real dick in a million years because it's just fundamentally not the same thing as the illusion created by artists.
I dunno, I think I'd only give 90% of them benefit of the doubt, tops.
No, you do. Honestly it's creepy how many replies I'm getting from people ITT trying to defend lolicons.
How the fuck would you know? Are you a lolicon? Do you have lots of lolicon friends?
i know some lolicons have gotten actual pedos arrested when they searched the backgrounds of some antis that they turned out to be actual pedos.
I'm not trying to 'defend lolicons', I'm trying to defend reality. You have an opinion that I am 100% certain is simply at odds with the objective reality of the situation. I vociferously attack all objectively wrong opinions regardless of what side of current politics they appear on, because I prize objectivity.
I know because I am an erotic artist. I don't produce lolicon - far from it - but I do draw things things that don't really resemble anything real. I draw them in a way that is beyond reality, and I venture into finding shapes that makes people's brains light up. I am essentially producing visual patterns that don't exist in nature, and short-circuit brains that have evolved in nature. I'm hacking the brain.
It is to be completely expected, then, that the images I produce will generate feelings of attraction where a real life approximation of the subject would not. One such case is fat women. You can draw fat women so beautiful - it's easy. The brain loves big, bouncy round shapes. She can have flawless skin, her rolls (if there are any) can be golden ratio'd in their distribution, she can have a skinny neck an firm under-arms, her facial structure need not be buried under blubber, her ankles need not be cankles, her thighs can be massive and yet not deform or overhang her knees. I can draw a 450lb blob and make her look good. Reality can't do that.
I saw a nude photograph of Lizzo this week, and she looked repulsive. I could draw a cartoon of her and make her beautiful, but guess what? It wouldn't be her no matter how much I said it was, and any boner generated by it would be unlikely to equate to a boner for the flesh and blood bridge troll that is Lizzo.
Fr, I'm convinced this site is being subverted.