i've visited Malaysia before and have had the unpleasant experience of muslims waking me up in the morning with their annoying loud ass prayers. Of course they are welcome to do that in their own countries but they need to get out of the West
America shouldnt have come up with that idea in the first place. Japan used to be State Shinto until America made them have separation of Shinto and State
Strictly speaking you don't even need to be an outright theocracy, Genoa and Venice prove that Christian republics can work for literally more than a thousand years. Not coincidentally, both Christian republics also played a huge role in anti-(Muslim)Ottoman operations throughout the Mediterranean for centuries, and a Genoese volunteer named Giovanni Giustiniani was the #2 guy among the Christian defenders during the Fall of Constantinople.
Only intra-Christian issue I can think of is that, American Christianity being historically multiconfessional rather than strictly Catholic-dominated (as was the case in Genoa & Venice both) or dominated by a specific Protestant sect, you might have more than a little trouble deducing which church should be the state one. In that regard a republic which enshrines a sort of non-denominational Christianity 'in general' as the state religion, akin to what John B. Anderson once proposed before cucking out massively, might be a better idea than the traditional 'one state, one very specific church' formula.
But in that vein, with all the woke trashfire heresies running around, it'd also be prudent to work toward an ecumenical solution in the vein of a modern Council of Nicaea (acknowledging differences but also common ground between those strains of Christianity that can still be remotely considered legitimate, while proscribing obvious heretics like Episcopalians & forming a common front against them) than refighting ye olde sectarian conflicts. If Austrians and Serbs could set aside their differences to push back against the Turks, there's no reason modern Catholics, Evangelicals, more conservative Lutherans and Presbyterians (like the ones shot up by a pooner two weeks ago) couldn't do the same against the deconstructionists & their pets, Muslims and corrupted '''''churches''''' both, when their backs are against the wall. And that point's already been here for a while.
Above all, I think this episode serves to reinforce the truth that a vacuum exists to be filled: if you remove traditional Christianity, something much worse will inevitably fill the gap. And by extension that the progressive deconstructionists are liars whose babbling about 'equity' and 'empathy' and 'healing' serves only to get people to let their guard down so they themselves can tear off the sheepskin to reveal the ravening wolves underneath, as if we needed more evidence of that.
Of course they are welcome to do that in their own countries
Each and every one of them is a former Christian Catholic or pagan country, they are all stolen, pillaged and desolated lands.
They are welcome to do it nowhere, their evil pedophilic possessed 'prophet' was at best an insane murderer. He and his teachings are evil, and must be pushed back to the place from whence they came
'welcome to it in their own countries'. They have no lands that were not stolen. Enough with namby pamby 'moderate takes' which amount to tolerating devil worship. Dues Vult, push them back and reclaim Christendom.
i mean you could say the same thing about how every Christian country was a former pagan country.
But If you're interested in removing Islam the best way to go about it is through national socialism actually. There are some middle eastern national socialist parties that believed their countries should go back to to their native pagan roots,
Honestly though im less worried about muslims than i am about liberals and banker jews at the moment
i've visited Malaysia before and have had the unpleasant experience of muslims waking me up in the morning with their annoying loud ass prayers. Of course they are welcome to do that in their own countries but they need to get out of the West
America shouldnt have come up with that idea in the first place. Japan used to be State Shinto until America made them have separation of Shinto and State
Strictly speaking you don't even need to be an outright theocracy, Genoa and Venice prove that Christian republics can work for literally more than a thousand years. Not coincidentally, both Christian republics also played a huge role in anti-(Muslim)Ottoman operations throughout the Mediterranean for centuries, and a Genoese volunteer named Giovanni Giustiniani was the #2 guy among the Christian defenders during the Fall of Constantinople.
Only intra-Christian issue I can think of is that, American Christianity being historically multiconfessional rather than strictly Catholic-dominated (as was the case in Genoa & Venice both) or dominated by a specific Protestant sect, you might have more than a little trouble deducing which church should be the state one. In that regard a republic which enshrines a sort of non-denominational Christianity 'in general' as the state religion, akin to what John B. Anderson once proposed before cucking out massively, might be a better idea than the traditional 'one state, one very specific church' formula.
But in that vein, with all the woke trashfire heresies running around, it'd also be prudent to work toward an ecumenical solution in the vein of a modern Council of Nicaea (acknowledging differences but also common ground between those strains of Christianity that can still be remotely considered legitimate, while proscribing obvious heretics like Episcopalians & forming a common front against them) than refighting ye olde sectarian conflicts. If Austrians and Serbs could set aside their differences to push back against the Turks, there's no reason modern Catholics, Evangelicals, more conservative Lutherans and Presbyterians (like the ones shot up by a pooner two weeks ago) couldn't do the same against the deconstructionists & their pets, Muslims and corrupted '''''churches''''' both, when their backs are against the wall. And that point's already been here for a while.
Above all, I think this episode serves to reinforce the truth that a vacuum exists to be filled: if you remove traditional Christianity, something much worse will inevitably fill the gap. And by extension that the progressive deconstructionists are liars whose babbling about 'equity' and 'empathy' and 'healing' serves only to get people to let their guard down so they themselves can tear off the sheepskin to reveal the ravening wolves underneath, as if we needed more evidence of that.
Okay.
Which branch?
imperial japan had the best drip
Each and every one of them is a former Christian Catholic or pagan country, they are all stolen, pillaged and desolated lands.
They are welcome to do it nowhere, their evil pedophilic possessed 'prophet' was at best an insane murderer. He and his teachings are evil, and must be pushed back to the place from whence they came
'welcome to it in their own countries'. They have no lands that were not stolen. Enough with namby pamby 'moderate takes' which amount to tolerating devil worship. Dues Vult, push them back and reclaim Christendom.
Deus Vult, brother
i mean you could say the same thing about how every Christian country was a former pagan country.
But If you're interested in removing Islam the best way to go about it is through national socialism actually. There are some middle eastern national socialist parties that believed their countries should go back to to their native pagan roots,
Honestly though im less worried about muslims than i am about liberals and banker jews at the moment