Let me ask you: if someone walked into a doctors office and asked them to cut off one of his arms because he "feels" like a one-armed person, should that be allowed? Is it copacetic to give people permanent, life-altering procedures and amputate healthy body parts because someone "feels" like they should have them? Shouldn't we at least try some level of therapy.
I REALLY don't understand how people are jumping to the conclusion I am PERMISSIVE of troon behaviour or indoctrination from saying 'I don't care about this person in particular'?
They should get therapy but the TYPE of therapists that currently have 'qualifications' are largely the ones encouraging the self maiming to become 'the person you need to be'. This isn't like gays or Lesbians where it can be reduced to a sexuality and seperated from ideology, this is a cult that encourages self maiming and corruption of others. There's no redeeming qualities to it since it doesn't even represent a desire to be the opposite sex, most of them want to be their unique thing inbetween which is why they manipulate language and pronouns.
I said it CAN not that it can apply to every one of them. If you seem to suggest that being gay cannot be separated from the cult of leftist, it'd be like saying a black people by default support BLM.
I REALLY don't understand how people are jumping to the conclusion I am PERMISSIVE of troon behaviour or indoctrination from saying 'I don't care about this person in particular'?
The problem is that "allowing people to do what they want" has allowed it to get out of hand. While I agree that adults should be able to pursue their own wants and desires with things like body modification, it comes with the caveat that it doesn't effect those who don't consent. Sadly, this is what we're starting to see.
You have all these freaks that are demanding that they use your tax dollars in order to Mr. Potatohead themselves into Ms. Potatohead. Likewise, you have the same circus show saying they sexually identify as Aussie and that you should refer to them as fight/me/cunt while allowing them to glass you with a bottle of VB.
So, while I can understand what you mean, the reality is that "allowing people to do what they want" does, in effect, allow such behaviour since telling people not to twerk naked in front of 12 year olds can be seen as "telling people what to do".
Yes I get your point, but the whole trans shit seems....'artificial' to me, it seems like there was a major push for it in the early 2010s era as it was nowhere near normie culture like it is now.
There's allowing people to do what they want, then there's the brainwashing cult the left put in place for a decade. I seriously doubt we would have it to this level WITHOUT medical and education establishment intervention
I REALLY don't understand how people are jumping to the conclusion I am PERMISSIVE of troon behaviour or indoctrination from saying 'I don't care about this person in particular'?
That's fine if you don't care about this one specific person, but you said "that's my universal line" meaning you're talking about the group.
They're not jumping to conclusions, they just took "universal line" as applying to "impose it on children" rather than "don't give a shit [about him in particular]". You can see how they'd read it that way since what for you intended they'd have to first infer the "about him in particular".
Let me ask you: if someone walked into a doctors office and asked them to cut off one of his arms because he "feels" like a one-armed person, should that be allowed? Is it copacetic to give people permanent, life-altering procedures and amputate healthy body parts because someone "feels" like they should have them? Shouldn't we at least try some level of therapy.
I REALLY don't understand how people are jumping to the conclusion I am PERMISSIVE of troon behaviour or indoctrination from saying 'I don't care about this person in particular'?
They should get therapy but the TYPE of therapists that currently have 'qualifications' are largely the ones encouraging the self maiming to become 'the person you need to be'. This isn't like gays or Lesbians where it can be reduced to a sexuality and seperated from ideology, this is a cult that encourages self maiming and corruption of others. There's no redeeming qualities to it since it doesn't even represent a desire to be the opposite sex, most of them want to be their unique thing inbetween which is why they manipulate language and pronouns.
I said it CAN not that it can apply to every one of them. If you seem to suggest that being gay cannot be separated from the cult of leftist, it'd be like saying a black people by default support BLM.
The problem is that "allowing people to do what they want" has allowed it to get out of hand. While I agree that adults should be able to pursue their own wants and desires with things like body modification, it comes with the caveat that it doesn't effect those who don't consent. Sadly, this is what we're starting to see.
You have all these freaks that are demanding that they use your tax dollars in order to Mr. Potatohead themselves into Ms. Potatohead. Likewise, you have the same circus show saying they sexually identify as Aussie and that you should refer to them as fight/me/cunt while allowing them to glass you with a bottle of VB.
So, while I can understand what you mean, the reality is that "allowing people to do what they want" does, in effect, allow such behaviour since telling people not to twerk naked in front of 12 year olds can be seen as "telling people what to do".
Yes I get your point, but the whole trans shit seems....'artificial' to me, it seems like there was a major push for it in the early 2010s era as it was nowhere near normie culture like it is now.
There's allowing people to do what they want, then there's the brainwashing cult the left put in place for a decade. I seriously doubt we would have it to this level WITHOUT medical and education establishment intervention
That's fine if you don't care about this one specific person, but you said "that's my universal line" meaning you're talking about the group.
They're not jumping to conclusions, they just took "universal line" as applying to "impose it on children" rather than "don't give a shit [about him in particular]". You can see how they'd read it that way since what for you intended they'd have to first infer the "about him in particular".
That's how they took it? I meant universal against ALL pedophilia
Straight, gay, male female, troon whatever your focus is corrupting kids you get the chair.