I said it CAN not that it can apply to every one of them. If you seem to suggest that being gay cannot be separated from the cult of leftist, it'd be like saying a black people by default support BLM.
Except race is something you are born with and cannot change, whereas sexuality is falsely claimed to be born with, but in reality is usually rooted heavily in environment and cycles of abuse.
Plus, this change of blacks supporting all this trash is a recent invention that's only really been around since the 60s-80s.
Gayness is also literally an anathema to conservatism, it is a sin and a stigma in most religions and cultures connected to said religions like the West's, which is an important aspect of conservatism. The same does not apply to race.
The best you can do as a gay conservative is to suppress your desires, and even potentially be changed to become heterosexual. As a social issue, being gay is all but at odds with being a conservative, and effectively you cannot be a "gay conservative" anymore than you can be a "family values communist".
The issue there is we have examples of those that can resist and even show that it doesn't define them. If we can repeat that like detransitioning someone from a cult, we could break the link that to be gay necessitates you to be on the left.
Break that link first then we can move onto stopping the social contagion but so long as the left can apply their ideology to a personality or physical characteristic, we can't effectively reduce their numbers.
It doesn't matter if it "doesn't define them"; if it didn't define them, it wouldn't be such a polarizing a label to begin with, some acts and states of being are so different from normal, that yes, they define you, and being gay is one of those things. If you fucked a horse but were completely normal otherwise, people wouldn't focus on the normal aspect of your life, you'd be known as a horsefucker.
Being gay doesn't necessitate you to be on the left ideologically, but its a state of being that is inherently against conservative social values.
It doesn't matter if the left uses any personality or physical characteristic to recruit, the nature of post-modernist ideology is to allow them to use anything to their advantage, its an amorphous creation whose only goal is destruction.
The way the right counters this is by having absolutes that should not be compromised; one way this is accomplished is with a concrete morality system, and gayness is something that goes against that morality system in the past.
Being gay was a crime for a very long time in the West until recently.
If you want to "reduce" their numbers, try gaining actual power and ensuring your own side doesn't collapse. The left cannot technically lose because the left cannot really be defined; the right cannot take the same approach because then there would be no real difference between the right and the left, leading, ironically, to the leftist's victory.
I said it CAN not that it can apply to every one of them. If you seem to suggest that being gay cannot be separated from the cult of leftist, it'd be like saying a black people by default support BLM.
Except race is something you are born with and cannot change, whereas sexuality is falsely claimed to be born with, but in reality is usually rooted heavily in environment and cycles of abuse.
Plus, this change of blacks supporting all this trash is a recent invention that's only really been around since the 60s-80s.
Gayness is also literally an anathema to conservatism, it is a sin and a stigma in most religions and cultures connected to said religions like the West's, which is an important aspect of conservatism. The same does not apply to race.
The best you can do as a gay conservative is to suppress your desires, and even potentially be changed to become heterosexual. As a social issue, being gay is all but at odds with being a conservative, and effectively you cannot be a "gay conservative" anymore than you can be a "family values communist".
The issue there is we have examples of those that can resist and even show that it doesn't define them. If we can repeat that like detransitioning someone from a cult, we could break the link that to be gay necessitates you to be on the left.
Break that link first then we can move onto stopping the social contagion but so long as the left can apply their ideology to a personality or physical characteristic, we can't effectively reduce their numbers.
It doesn't matter if it "doesn't define them"; if it didn't define them, it wouldn't be such a polarizing a label to begin with, some acts and states of being are so different from normal, that yes, they define you, and being gay is one of those things. If you fucked a horse but were completely normal otherwise, people wouldn't focus on the normal aspect of your life, you'd be known as a horsefucker.
Being gay doesn't necessitate you to be on the left ideologically, but its a state of being that is inherently against conservative social values.
It doesn't matter if the left uses any personality or physical characteristic to recruit, the nature of post-modernist ideology is to allow them to use anything to their advantage, its an amorphous creation whose only goal is destruction.
The way the right counters this is by having absolutes that should not be compromised; one way this is accomplished is with a concrete morality system, and gayness is something that goes against that morality system in the past. Being gay was a crime for a very long time in the West until recently.
If you want to "reduce" their numbers, try gaining actual power and ensuring your own side doesn't collapse. The left cannot technically lose because the left cannot really be defined; the right cannot take the same approach because then there would be no real difference between the right and the left, leading, ironically, to the leftist's victory.