What? This is ridiculous. I'm not going to pretend to be a retard full time to LE OWN THEM LIBS.
They are ruining the clarity of language and through that, human communication too. Should we also take another shit on it?
Even you admit it wouldn't win anything, just make the perpetually mad, whiny, bitchy libtards keep doing the same. So what's the point, other than us debasing ourselves for "the lulz" or whatever?
We would be shitting on THEIR language not language itself. I didn't say it "wouldn't win anything", I said it wouldn't win the war meaning that's it's not an end all solution. It would definitely affect their soft power which is the entire point. To appropriate their culture so that they lose their identity which reduce their ability to congregate. It's not for the "lulz", I said if all else fails, then at least they'd be mad but that's not the objective. Chill, breath, and take time to think about it before straight up dismissing it.
Oh, so we would convince the powers that be that almost everyone is "queer"? Basically giving the established left one more piece of "proof" that straights don't exist, etc.?
Yes and no. Yes, everyone would be queer. No, queer would be an alternative word for straight. The same way they muddy words like "women", we muddy their lexicon.
The best way to damage wokies is to wait for a monetary collapse and the end of the Global American Empire (GAE). Then the government won't have the resources to fund the globohomo agenda.
Fortunately for us, the cracks are showing with bank failures and same-day not-a-bailouts.
As usual, the right persuades itself that the best course of action is "do absolutely nothing".
You may be sure that there will be a 'montary collapse', but that my no means makes it a certainty. It's also not just the government funding it. I do think an economic collapse would be good for anti-woke, because you have less money to spend on nonsense when you are short of it.
You may be sure that there will be a 'montary collapse', but that my no means makes it a certainty.
You: "It's different this time!" Sure, bud. The West is a bunch of dying geriatrics running on debt. More and more countries are de-dollarizing, including France. Speaking of, France continues to riot, not for freedom or some other high-minded shit, but ONLY because they're losing their gibsmedats. Fucking Germany is back to burning brown coal, and their official CPlie is now in the double digits like the third-world shithole it is.
France continues to riot, not for freedom or some other high-minded shit, but ONLY because their losing their gibsmedats.
I mean, the retirement benefits that THEY WORKED FOR. I actually thought it was wise policy on Macron's part, but then someone here pointed out something quite valid, namely that people should protest when the government makes their lives worse. I know from personal experience that when you raise the retirement age, that the government just finds new things to waste money on, like 'climate'.
But nah, it'll be fine.
I have no idea what's going to happen, and neither do you. I think it's likely that things will come to a head, but counting on it is what a fool would do.
I mean, the retirement benefits that THEY WORKED FOR
It's not YOUR money, it's the GOVERNMENT'S. YOU gave it to THEM. Did you honestly believe the fucking government would be good stewards of your money? Maybe save your own money if you don't want to be at the mercy of the feds and their perpetually changing rules, especially when you already know they would waste it on pet projects like climate shit.
I have no idea what's going to happen, and neither do you.
Shit in one hand, and hope in another. Feel free to ignore the societal tumors, but don't blame me when it becomes terminal cancer. You were warned.
The problem is that even if you do appropriate that hideous 'trans flag', that does not damage their ideology. They just switch to another and continue right on.
Creating a symbolic identity takes time OR a large scale panic to speed up the process (BLM riots for example). It's not trivial otherwise to ask your entire user base to change and adopt the new symbols and lexicon. Each cycle of change further dilute the made up identity because not everyone will adopt it and people will grow tired of it. This is how the damage to the ideology is made. As the symbols keep diversifying and lose their meaning, they also lose their rallying power. And the thing is, we don't need every conservative to adopt the symbols to make this work, only a recognizable minority but THEY, the wokies, need as many people as possible to stand under the same symbols.
Think about the profile pic filters as an example of this in action. Every leftist has their feel good filter when a large scale event occur like the Ukraine invasion but a much smaller percentage of people will change their pic for smaller events. This is the attention gap we'd abuse.
Also, I talked about individuals but it's even harder for corporations and organizationsn to adopt new symbols. BUT, theyd drop the old ones in an instant IF the trans flag could mean an association to "far right" beliefs. Not doing otherwise is an invitation for larger critique which we know they hate. Actually, that's probably the greatest effect of this idea. By losing corpo support, we deal one hell of a blow to woke ideology
What? This is ridiculous. I'm not going to pretend to be a retard full time to LE OWN THEM LIBS.
They are ruining the clarity of language and through that, human communication too. Should we also take another shit on it?
Even you admit it wouldn't win anything, just make the perpetually mad, whiny, bitchy libtards keep doing the same. So what's the point, other than us debasing ourselves for "the lulz" or whatever?
We would be shitting on THEIR language not language itself. I didn't say it "wouldn't win anything", I said it wouldn't win the war meaning that's it's not an end all solution. It would definitely affect their soft power which is the entire point. To appropriate their culture so that they lose their identity which reduce their ability to congregate. It's not for the "lulz", I said if all else fails, then at least they'd be mad but that's not the objective. Chill, breath, and take time to think about it before straight up dismissing it.
Oh, so we would convince the powers that be that almost everyone is "queer"? Basically giving the established left one more piece of "proof" that straights don't exist, etc.?
Yes and no. Yes, everyone would be queer. No, queer would be an alternative word for straight. The same way they muddy words like "women", we muddy their lexicon.
The best way to damage wokies is to wait for a monetary collapse and the end of the Global American Empire (GAE). Then the government won't have the resources to fund the globohomo agenda.
Fortunately for us, the cracks are showing with bank failures and same-day not-a-bailouts.
As usual, the right persuades itself that the best course of action is "do absolutely nothing".
You may be sure that there will be a 'montary collapse', but that my no means makes it a certainty. It's also not just the government funding it. I do think an economic collapse would be good for anti-woke, because you have less money to spend on nonsense when you are short of it.
You: "It's different this time!" Sure, bud. The West is a bunch of dying geriatrics running on debt. More and more countries are de-dollarizing, including France. Speaking of, France continues to riot, not for freedom or some other high-minded shit, but ONLY because they're losing their gibsmedats. Fucking Germany is back to burning brown coal, and their official CPlie is now in the double digits like the third-world shithole it is.
But nah, it'll be fine.
I mean, the retirement benefits that THEY WORKED FOR. I actually thought it was wise policy on Macron's part, but then someone here pointed out something quite valid, namely that people should protest when the government makes their lives worse. I know from personal experience that when you raise the retirement age, that the government just finds new things to waste money on, like 'climate'.
I have no idea what's going to happen, and neither do you. I think it's likely that things will come to a head, but counting on it is what a fool would do.
It's not YOUR money, it's the GOVERNMENT'S. YOU gave it to THEM. Did you honestly believe the fucking government would be good stewards of your money? Maybe save your own money if you don't want to be at the mercy of the feds and their perpetually changing rules, especially when you already know they would waste it on pet projects like climate shit.
Shit in one hand, and hope in another. Feel free to ignore the societal tumors, but don't blame me when it becomes terminal cancer. You were warned.
The problem is that even if you do appropriate that hideous 'trans flag', that does not damage their ideology. They just switch to another and continue right on.
Creating a symbolic identity takes time OR a large scale panic to speed up the process (BLM riots for example). It's not trivial otherwise to ask your entire user base to change and adopt the new symbols and lexicon. Each cycle of change further dilute the made up identity because not everyone will adopt it and people will grow tired of it. This is how the damage to the ideology is made. As the symbols keep diversifying and lose their meaning, they also lose their rallying power. And the thing is, we don't need every conservative to adopt the symbols to make this work, only a recognizable minority but THEY, the wokies, need as many people as possible to stand under the same symbols.
Think about the profile pic filters as an example of this in action. Every leftist has their feel good filter when a large scale event occur like the Ukraine invasion but a much smaller percentage of people will change their pic for smaller events. This is the attention gap we'd abuse.
Also, I talked about individuals but it's even harder for corporations and organizationsn to adopt new symbols. BUT, theyd drop the old ones in an instant IF the trans flag could mean an association to "far right" beliefs. Not doing otherwise is an invitation for larger critique which we know they hate. Actually, that's probably the greatest effect of this idea. By losing corpo support, we deal one hell of a blow to woke ideology
Interesting, and yours is the kind of creativity that we need, but I don't think it would actually work.
Posted for: Rule 11 - Spam
Post Removed: Please have a longer comment history in the sub before you post.
How the fuck is this spam?
That's just the report.
Please have a longer comment history in the sub before you post.