Yeah - and there’s no magical cutoff.
These experimental shots cause heart damage in ALL ages.
But when a 70 year old has a heart attack it is attributed to his age. When a 17 year old boy suddenly dies it is difficult to ignore.
This is why pfizer unblinded their vaccine trial after only a few weeks(anybody who got the placebo was given the vaxx). It is a strategy to hide long term side effects.
All new “vaccines” have similar dangers. These criminal pharma companies and their collaborators at the FDA/CDC have been playing these dirty tricks for a long time.
But when a 70 year old has a heart attack it is attributed to his age. When a 17 year old boy suddenly dies it is difficult to ignore.
Yup, a lot of people aren't making that connection, and want to act like 'well, the vaccines are still great in some scenarios.' When it might be the case that, as you say, it's just more evident in younger people.
You are half correct, the reason they destroyed their own study was because they fought hard to ensure it was the ONLY major study into the vaccine.
When participants began having negative medical reactions instead of counting them in the study they actually removed them from the study, 95% of all people removed from the clinical trial came out of the 'experimental' group.
In order to hide that fact they had to destroy the study completely or else people would have figured out that all the negative reactions got dropped from the study instead of tallied properly.
They thought destroying the study was the only way to hide that, and they were right. Since no other large scale clinical trials are being conducted nobody can prove them wrong.
Yeah - and there’s no magical cutoff. These experimental shots cause heart damage in ALL ages.
But when a 70 year old has a heart attack it is attributed to his age. When a 17 year old boy suddenly dies it is difficult to ignore.
This is why pfizer unblinded their vaccine trial after only a few weeks(anybody who got the placebo was given the vaxx). It is a strategy to hide long term side effects.
All new “vaccines” have similar dangers. These criminal pharma companies and their collaborators at the FDA/CDC have been playing these dirty tricks for a long time.
Yup, a lot of people aren't making that connection, and want to act like 'well, the vaccines are still great in some scenarios.' When it might be the case that, as you say, it's just more evident in younger people.
If you go for a cancer trial - they won’t unblind it.
The fact that they did it for a disease with a <1% mortality rate but not for a disease with a 30% mortality rate?
$$$💰🤑
You are half correct, the reason they destroyed their own study was because they fought hard to ensure it was the ONLY major study into the vaccine.
When participants began having negative medical reactions instead of counting them in the study they actually removed them from the study, 95% of all people removed from the clinical trial came out of the 'experimental' group.
In order to hide that fact they had to destroy the study completely or else people would have figured out that all the negative reactions got dropped from the study instead of tallied properly.
They thought destroying the study was the only way to hide that, and they were right. Since no other large scale clinical trials are being conducted nobody can prove them wrong.