You are half correct, the reason they destroyed their own study was because they fought hard to ensure it was the ONLY major study into the vaccine.
When participants began having negative medical reactions instead of counting them in the study they actually removed them from the study, 95% of all people removed from the clinical trial came out of the 'experimental' group.
In order to hide that fact they had to destroy the study completely or else people would have figured out that all the negative reactions got dropped from the study instead of tallied properly.
They thought destroying the study was the only way to hide that, and they were right. Since no other large scale clinical trials are being conducted nobody can prove them wrong.
If you go for a cancer trial - they won’t unblind it.
The fact that they did it for a disease with a <1% mortality rate but not for a disease with a 30% mortality rate?
$$$💰🤑
You are half correct, the reason they destroyed their own study was because they fought hard to ensure it was the ONLY major study into the vaccine.
When participants began having negative medical reactions instead of counting them in the study they actually removed them from the study, 95% of all people removed from the clinical trial came out of the 'experimental' group.
In order to hide that fact they had to destroy the study completely or else people would have figured out that all the negative reactions got dropped from the study instead of tallied properly.
They thought destroying the study was the only way to hide that, and they were right. Since no other large scale clinical trials are being conducted nobody can prove them wrong.