Note that the 'son' who was shot was in his thirties. He was not what the custody battle was about, one hopes.
But let's say it was about that. Often times in these cases, they don't want the kids for the kids' sake, but to deny them to their partner, and to have a 'win'. Sometimes parents kill a child or troon it just to break the heart of the other parent.
The Solomon parable might not work today in our morally degraded state.
I guess that's what I get for only reading the headline. Weird that it'd say "father and son" in regards to a "custody battle," and not "ex and his father."
... What?
Note that the 'son' who was shot was in his thirties. He was not what the custody battle was about, one hopes.
But let's say it was about that. Often times in these cases, they don't want the kids for the kids' sake, but to deny them to their partner, and to have a 'win'. Sometimes parents kill a child or troon it just to break the heart of the other parent.
The Solomon parable might not work today in our morally degraded state.
I guess that's what I get for only reading the headline. Weird that it'd say "father and son" in regards to a "custody battle," and not "ex and his father."
That's the same headline the article uses.
Reminds me of King Solomon's offer to saw the baby in half.
"If I can't have it, he can't either!"