You still have protective skin after they 'freeze off moles'. Apparently, you would be fine with the removal of all the skin on your face, because IT'S JUST SKIN!
No the skin grows and recovers after a mole is removed, just as the skin recovers from a circumcision in a matter of days…
I'm not going to debate "recovery time" for a deranged practice that should not exist. It's like saying that chopping off a baby's arm has a lower recovery rate, so we should do it at birth rather than at age 20.
And again we have the conflation, can’t go a sentence without it!
Try coming to Europe, or in any country where your own Slavic people live, and ask them about how they feel about getting their foreskins chopped off because you were zombified by American Westoid ideology (on this issue).
Should I also ask them about how they have a shorter average lifespan than American Slavs?
LOL! Your foreskin grew back? You really are a miracle-worker.
Just like the mole grows back? Try harder.
It's called an analogy. You're not dumb. Why are you pretending not to understand what a comparison is? To compare is not to equate.
And a bad comparison is what again? You don’t even try to make an actual comparison. For example cutting off the skin on a fingertip is about the same size and nerve endings. However even the finger tip will have permanent nerve damage that doesn’t heal upon regrowth.
You actually convinced yourself that you have a higher life expectancy because you slit your foreskin? But nice attempt at diversion.
Cute, you said to ask them their opinion, I made another example of asking their opinion
You're very confused, let me explain. A mole is not a natural part of the human body. It should not grow back. One's foreskin is.
For example cutting off the skin on a fingertip is about the same size and nerve endings. However even the finger tip will have permanent nerve damage that doesn’t heal upon regrowth.
And you think the foreskin has no nerve endings? Insane. Look, I get that you try to persuade yourself that your body is perfectly fine, but can you not do it in a way that advocates for the mutilation of future generations without their consent?
Cute, you said to ask them their opinion, I made another example of asking their opinion
Yup, a very bad one. Slavs everywhere are sane. The ones in America are deranged, at least on this issue.
You're very confused, let me explain. A mole is not a natural part of the human body. It should not grow back. One's foreskin is.
When a person is born with a mole, the mole is called a congenital mole. Roughly, 1 out of 100 people is born with a mole. Are you going to say freckles aren’t a natural part of the human body next just because everyone isn’t born with them?
And you think the foreskin has no nerve endings? Insane. Look, I get that you try to persuade yourself that your body is perfectly fine, but can you not do it in a way that advocates for the mutilation of future generations without their consent?
I’m well aware of the nerve endings in the foreskin, the difference is , as I said, there is no nerve damage from the remaining tissue which is different than a fingertip.
Yup, a very bad one. Slavs everywhere are sane. The ones in America are deranged, at least on this issue.
So American Slavs live longer because they’re deranged?
No the skin grows and recovers after a mole is removed, just as the skin recovers from a circumcision in a matter of days…
And again we have the conflation, can’t go a sentence without it!
Should I also ask them about how they have a shorter average lifespan than American Slavs?
LOL! Your foreskin grew back? You really are a miracle-worker.
It's called an analogy. You're not dumb. Why are you pretending not to understand what a comparison is? To compare is not to equate.
You actually convinced yourself that you have a higher life expectancy because you slit your foreskin? But nice attempt at diversion.
Just like the mole grows back? Try harder.
And a bad comparison is what again? You don’t even try to make an actual comparison. For example cutting off the skin on a fingertip is about the same size and nerve endings. However even the finger tip will have permanent nerve damage that doesn’t heal upon regrowth.
Cute, you said to ask them their opinion, I made another example of asking their opinion
You're very confused, let me explain. A mole is not a natural part of the human body. It should not grow back. One's foreskin is.
And you think the foreskin has no nerve endings? Insane. Look, I get that you try to persuade yourself that your body is perfectly fine, but can you not do it in a way that advocates for the mutilation of future generations without their consent?
Yup, a very bad one. Slavs everywhere are sane. The ones in America are deranged, at least on this issue.
When a person is born with a mole, the mole is called a congenital mole. Roughly, 1 out of 100 people is born with a mole. Are you going to say freckles aren’t a natural part of the human body next just because everyone isn’t born with them?
I’m well aware of the nerve endings in the foreskin, the difference is , as I said, there is no nerve damage from the remaining tissue which is different than a fingertip.
So American Slavs live longer because they’re deranged?