I love how the only time you'll acknowledge race is to hate on white women. The only time you differentiate women is to single out white women. Funny, since it's counter to all your usual monolithic thinking.
There are many problems with modern women. There are many problems with modern white women. But many of those same traits in white women are in all women, so it's funny to suddenly start categorizing.
It wouldn't be so ridiculous, if it wasn't coming from you, who always hates women, but suddenly needs to differentiate and separate. Get a new shtick.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda, that it is just an anti-male agenda, but people still say the same tired bullshit.
I've read the ESG reports. I've studied their NGOs. I've archived probably a thousand websites.
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women. That's why the establishment right stopped trying to repeal it and created "race-based discrimination" narratives.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated against openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda...
HAHAHAHAHA. Oh my. Are you serious?
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
But it does mention race! You yourself are saying there is racial discrimination baked in. Multiple things can be true at the same time. There is an anti-male agenda, I absolutely agree. There is also an anti-white agenda. An anti-Christian agenda. A general anti-Western agenda.
Just because you hate women and think they're out to get men, doesn't mean there can't be racism. You sound like a progressive stacker when you say shit like that. You're basically saying there can't be racism because there is sexism. As I've said, there is sexism. But there is also racism.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women.
Are you talking per capita or raw numbers? Because there are a lot more white women (for now) than there are "POCs." The ease of entry is better for nonwhites than for women, though. If we're talking something like college or hiring policies, nonwhite trumps white women. Doesn't mean the current system doesn't benefit white women - it absolutely does - but nonwhites are still higher on the totem pole. For an example, there was that guy that got into Stanford by writing "#BlackLivesMatter" like a hundred times. That was a Muslim dude.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Bruh. I can't even with you sometimes. They'll openly say they want less white people, and that they'll prop up nonwhites. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I think it's a good example since it was such a high profile person: Joe Biden, holding the office of Vice President of the US, said it would be great when whites were a minority. The freaking VP, man. Just openly.
Also, just look at demographics. Most first-world white majority countries dropped from +90% white to ~60% white in less than a century. While our leaders fucking bragged about it.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated again openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
Firstly, I'm not sure you intended to, but that massively shifts the goal posts. Why? Because, let's say for the sake of argument white women are never discriminated against. They are, which I'll get to in a second, but bear with me. Alright, white women are immune. Still doesn't preclude that white men - white men - couldn't still be discriminated against at a greater rate than nonwhite men. So even if white women were immune, there could still be race-based anti-white discrimination going on. So your request is a total non sequitur.
Anyway, when are white women discriminated against? First thing that comes to mind is something like Muslim rape gangs. White women were literally told to shut up, not report rapes, wear sneakers so they could outrun their attackers, not go out at night, etc. And, I mean, did you see what she was wearing?! That narrative was going on in Germany, Sweden, etc. Countries that were actually fairly high on the feminist list, in fact. Even women often value nonwhites over white women. A bunch of the most anti white woman rhetoric comes from white women.
For more discrimination, white women are often given less of a chance against nonwhite women in hiring and the like. Again, goes back to your non sequitur. Even if white women had a systemic advantage over all nonwhite men - they don't - they can still be given less favorability than nonwhite women.
Also, just to make it very clear, you can recognize discrimination against whites without being one of the "stormfags" you like to go on about. Just for the record, I am not a Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent. In case you want to go that route. Anti-white discrimination is blatant, and I'm sick of it. Simple as.
"Orwellian" gets thrown around a lot but...
Also, I am so unbelievably sick and tired of the onslaught on white people.
It's mainstream, constant, nonstop, and there's no easy way to fight it.
White women sitting on the top of their pedestal, on top of a giant ivory tower : "Did you hear something?"
I love how the only time you'll acknowledge race is to hate on white women. The only time you differentiate women is to single out white women. Funny, since it's counter to all your usual monolithic thinking.
There are many problems with modern women. There are many problems with modern white women. But many of those same traits in white women are in all women, so it's funny to suddenly start categorizing.
It wouldn't be so ridiculous, if it wasn't coming from you, who always hates women, but suddenly needs to differentiate and separate. Get a new shtick.
You talked about race, I talked about race.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda, that it is just an anti-male agenda, but people still say the same tired bullshit.
I've read the ESG reports. I've studied their NGOs. I've archived probably a thousand websites.
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women. That's why the establishment right stopped trying to repeal it and created "race-based discrimination" narratives.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated against openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
HAHAHAHAHA. Oh my. Are you serious?
But it does mention race! You yourself are saying there is racial discrimination baked in. Multiple things can be true at the same time. There is an anti-male agenda, I absolutely agree. There is also an anti-white agenda. An anti-Christian agenda. A general anti-Western agenda.
Just because you hate women and think they're out to get men, doesn't mean there can't be racism. You sound like a progressive stacker when you say shit like that. You're basically saying there can't be racism because there is sexism. As I've said, there is sexism. But there is also racism.
Are you talking per capita or raw numbers? Because there are a lot more white women (for now) than there are "POCs." The ease of entry is better for nonwhites than for women, though. If we're talking something like college or hiring policies, nonwhite trumps white women. Doesn't mean the current system doesn't benefit white women - it absolutely does - but nonwhites are still higher on the totem pole. For an example, there was that guy that got into Stanford by writing "#BlackLivesMatter" like a hundred times. That was a Muslim dude.
Bruh. I can't even with you sometimes. They'll openly say they want less white people, and that they'll prop up nonwhites. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I think it's a good example since it was such a high profile person: Joe Biden, holding the office of Vice President of the US, said it would be great when whites were a minority. The freaking VP, man. Just openly.
Also, just look at demographics. Most first-world white majority countries dropped from +90% white to ~60% white in less than a century. While our leaders fucking bragged about it.
Firstly, I'm not sure you intended to, but that massively shifts the goal posts. Why? Because, let's say for the sake of argument white women are never discriminated against. They are, which I'll get to in a second, but bear with me. Alright, white women are immune. Still doesn't preclude that white men - white men - couldn't still be discriminated against at a greater rate than nonwhite men. So even if white women were immune, there could still be race-based anti-white discrimination going on. So your request is a total non sequitur.
Anyway, when are white women discriminated against? First thing that comes to mind is something like Muslim rape gangs. White women were literally told to shut up, not report rapes, wear sneakers so they could outrun their attackers, not go out at night, etc. And, I mean, did you see what she was wearing?! That narrative was going on in Germany, Sweden, etc. Countries that were actually fairly high on the feminist list, in fact. Even women often value nonwhites over white women. A bunch of the most anti white woman rhetoric comes from white women.
For more discrimination, white women are often given less of a chance against nonwhite women in hiring and the like. Again, goes back to your non sequitur. Even if white women had a systemic advantage over all nonwhite men - they don't - they can still be given less favorability than nonwhite women.
Also, just to make it very clear, you can recognize discrimination against whites without being one of the "stormfags" you like to go on about. Just for the record, I am not a Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent. In case you want to go that route. Anti-white discrimination is blatant, and I'm sick of it. Simple as.