Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than those in East Asian countries.
For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.
In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "some is being mean to me!" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they do they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).
I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)
(Going on a particularly wild tangent, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)
Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).
republican politicians in opposition to abortion even in incidents of rape
trans fixation by republicans
Left-wing talking points. What is your hang-up on these issues? Do you think Republicans are wrong, that they are cynically pandering so it doesn't matter if they are right or wrong, or that the issues are needlessly inflaming the "gender wars" so it doesn't matter if they are right or wrong?
the overturning of Roe v Wade... an attempt by mate guarding men in positions of power to lock down women
Clarence Thomas? Could it not be that he and his colleagues simply threw out a past opinion that was obviously unconstitutional to begin with?
Your point about these issues enraging feminists and the political left is spot on. Good.
MGTOW is 60%+ of men in japan and korea and climbing.
that's why they're panicking with this reactionary bullshit so hard. that base of betas are the lifeblood of labor in any society. when they check out, deciding that the juice is not worth the squeeze, all the nice things go with it.
Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than those in East Asian countries.
For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.
In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "some is being mean to me!" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they do they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).
I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)
(Going on a particularly wild tangent, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)
Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).
Men standing up against feminists probably will get those men more pussy from much more desireable looking women and less crazy women.
America's collapse will be race-based, not gender-based. South Africa is the outcome the race hustlers are aiming for.
Left-wing talking points. What is your hang-up on these issues? Do you think Republicans are wrong, that they are cynically pandering so it doesn't matter if they are right or wrong, or that the issues are needlessly inflaming the "gender wars" so it doesn't matter if they are right or wrong?
Clarence Thomas? Could it not be that he and his colleagues simply threw out a past opinion that was obviously unconstitutional to begin with?
Your point about these issues enraging feminists and the political left is spot on. Good.
I think South Korea is far too ethnically homogeneous to be comparable to the US.
MGTOW is 60%+ of men in japan and korea and climbing.
that's why they're panicking with this reactionary bullshit so hard. that base of betas are the lifeblood of labor in any society. when they check out, deciding that the juice is not worth the squeeze, all the nice things go with it.
I think that translates to "We're giving a fringe minority a loudspeaker because we like their message."
sk was run by a literal cultist for a bit