"defending women's sports/spaces" is pathetic simping.
It's not simping because there's examples again and again of a man being mediocre at best in his own sport, suddenly ''becoming'' a woman, and then entering said female sport and just dominating it. Calling this wrong isn't simping, it's just having common sense, for you to oppose this I am pretty sure you're inherently just against women playing sports which is the only reason why you have an issue with it.
I also don't have to be a TERF to notice trannies infest female spaces and pretend to be a part of them, say a locker room, is it simping to say that a fetishist crossdresser man shouldn't be changing in the female's room? Just like I wouldn't like mutilated female pretending to be a man to change next to me in my male changing room, because I am now expected to just deny basic biology and everything that I inherently know as a human being and pretend this is a man just like I am.
Megalia was believed to have hundreds of thousands of members before it was shut down for sharing CP.
So not only was it just believed instead of approximated by some reliable factor, but hudreds of thousands is a huge range, did they have 200k members? Or 800k members? And they did get shutdown, so...
The whole China thing is the reason why your male genocide thing is just not happening, at least we can partly agree on China being a necessary evil in the world considering they have neither a feminist problem nor a jew one, they run their own shit.
Source: heard the same stories from multiple Chinese people, sure you have your desperate simps like everywhere, but generally these women are considered undesirable.
Okay, I'll rephrase that - women popularized trannies. It's practically the same thing
It's not the same thing at all. It's 2 completely different things, 1 is popularizing an idea, the other one doing years of research and surgical experiments and creating something that never existed before.
they revived a dead ideology from the 30s for their own castration fetishes.
Here's my argument here, I'll just ask you a few questions then because your teachings have inconsistencies:
Why do I see quite literally every single radical feminist openly be against trannies? And how was the tranny ideology dead in the 30s now? I thought Hitler's Germany was built on women worship, how did the tranny ideology die in the 30s when you apparently had heaps of these incredibly influential feminists under Hitler, wouldn't have they prevented their creation/ideology from dying? Or are you now indirectly giving Hitler props for keeping feminists under him and simultaneously killing the tranny ideology?
You aren't seriously going to claim that Hirschfeld is the influence behind this revival, because that's an obvious lie.
There's 2 things here:
Hirschfeld wasn't one of his kind, Weimar was plagued with these ''sexologists'' as they called themselves and juden surgeons with experience from WW1 who were willing to perform their experiments. The good thing that Hitler did was burn most of their literature, but then he made a huge mistake of just exiling authors of said literature out of Germany. Think of it as me having a field where I grow my food, and there happens to be some toxic waste on it, so what do I do? I just take it out and throw it on your field and ignore it, now it's no longer poisoning my crops but it's poisoning your crops, eventually this will come back and bite you in the ass, the classic ''out of sight out of mind'' type of solutions which is why we have all these problems in society today. Hirschfeld was exiled to France, as were all of his ideas with him.
You're being disingenuous because you know very well that I am not saying that Hirschfeld himself, as an indivitual, who already died in the 30s, was responsible for reviving anything 30 years later, instead it was his kind, you know very well the kind I am talking about. I know you and I tend to disagree with each other but I don't think either one of us considers the other stupid, so don't do this.
Are you really going to claim the ultimate in ironic statements - that women's rise to leading culture and being borderline worshipped is just a coincidence?
This goes back to thing number 1, Hirschfeld wasn't one of his kind, plenty of his kind were exiled out of Germany and even more of his kind themselves immigrated, a lot of them to the USA, and coincidentally around the same time, the poison of pornography emerged and started spreading in the USA, a few decades later in the 60s, a certain organization ruled by a certain kind declassifies homosexuality as a mental illness, simultaneously the infamous sexual revolution begins, now feminists surely were part of it, but the academics behind it happened to have 1 crucial thing in common.
And woman worshipping is a very loose term with you, I can say that women have a role and place in a normal society, something that's been recorded throughout human history in different parts of the world and that is backed by basic biology, and you'll say I'm worshipping women, and don't pretend I'm not right.
It's not simping because there's examples again and again of a man being mediocre at best in his own sport, suddenly ''becoming'' a woman, and then entering said female sport and just dominating it.
It's still simping. Trannies will only improve the sporting value of women's joke sports anyway. Maybe they'll have a player who can score a dunk in the WNBA one day.
is it simping to say that a fetishist crossdresser man shouldn't be changing in the female's room?
Yes. Remind me, how did women treat male spaces? What are we currently going through with their presence in gyms? You're a fucking simp if you lift a finger for adult women, they don't deserve anything. At least protecting kids is morally right. Protecting women is just being a mark for the same con they pull over and over again.
Why do I see quite literally every single radical feminist openly be against trannies?
They aren't against trannies. They're against trannies being classed as women legally. Women's entire cheated achievements balance on that legal definition and they have to protect it.
The war between TERFs and "regular feminists" is simply a war of "do we cut their dicks off or kill them all?"
And how was the tranny ideology dead in the 30s now?
Because they took the tradcon deal of having a simp each.
I thought Hitler's Germany was built on women worship, how did the tranny ideology die in the 30s when you apparently had heaps of these incredibly influential feminists under Hitler, wouldn't have they prevented their creation/ideology from dying?
No, because women were given what they wanted. Endless rewards just for existing and protecting from the deserved consequences of their earlier actions.
the poison of pornography emerged and started spreading in the USA
Andrea Dworkin was a Jew, you're not even ideologically consistent. She was also pro-tranny, which makes this argument doubly hilarious.
Anyone who unironically says this retardation, built on women's lack of desire for any kind of competition in the marketplace because of how poorly they perform against it, has drunk so much kool-aid they need to go to the ER.
now feminists surely were part of it, but the academics behind it happened to have 1 crucial thing in common.
Except they didn't. You're really, really reaching now and it's honestly hilarious.
It's literally in Solanas' manifesto, as taught in Women's Studies, that transgenderism must be revived to "fix men".
There are a ridiculous number of examples that prove it definitively.
Women popularized a dead ideology that came from medical experiments performed by post-war surgeons because they wanted to destroy everything that is male, at all costs.
It's not simping because there's examples again and again of a man being mediocre at best in his own sport, suddenly ''becoming'' a woman, and then entering said female sport and just dominating it. Calling this wrong isn't simping, it's just having common sense, for you to oppose this I am pretty sure you're inherently just against women playing sports which is the only reason why you have an issue with it.
I also don't have to be a TERF to notice trannies infest female spaces and pretend to be a part of them, say a locker room, is it simping to say that a fetishist crossdresser man shouldn't be changing in the female's room? Just like I wouldn't like mutilated female pretending to be a man to change next to me in my male changing room, because I am now expected to just deny basic biology and everything that I inherently know as a human being and pretend this is a man just like I am.
So not only was it just believed instead of approximated by some reliable factor, but hudreds of thousands is a huge range, did they have 200k members? Or 800k members? And they did get shutdown, so...
The whole China thing is the reason why your male genocide thing is just not happening, at least we can partly agree on China being a necessary evil in the world considering they have neither a feminist problem nor a jew one, they run their own shit.
Source: heard the same stories from multiple Chinese people, sure you have your desperate simps like everywhere, but generally these women are considered undesirable.
It's not the same thing at all. It's 2 completely different things, 1 is popularizing an idea, the other one doing years of research and surgical experiments and creating something that never existed before.
Here's my argument here, I'll just ask you a few questions then because your teachings have inconsistencies:
Why do I see quite literally every single radical feminist openly be against trannies? And how was the tranny ideology dead in the 30s now? I thought Hitler's Germany was built on women worship, how did the tranny ideology die in the 30s when you apparently had heaps of these incredibly influential feminists under Hitler, wouldn't have they prevented their creation/ideology from dying? Or are you now indirectly giving Hitler props for keeping feminists under him and simultaneously killing the tranny ideology?
There's 2 things here:
Hirschfeld wasn't one of his kind, Weimar was plagued with these ''sexologists'' as they called themselves and juden surgeons with experience from WW1 who were willing to perform their experiments. The good thing that Hitler did was burn most of their literature, but then he made a huge mistake of just exiling authors of said literature out of Germany. Think of it as me having a field where I grow my food, and there happens to be some toxic waste on it, so what do I do? I just take it out and throw it on your field and ignore it, now it's no longer poisoning my crops but it's poisoning your crops, eventually this will come back and bite you in the ass, the classic ''out of sight out of mind'' type of solutions which is why we have all these problems in society today. Hirschfeld was exiled to France, as were all of his ideas with him.
You're being disingenuous because you know very well that I am not saying that Hirschfeld himself, as an indivitual, who already died in the 30s, was responsible for reviving anything 30 years later, instead it was his kind, you know very well the kind I am talking about. I know you and I tend to disagree with each other but I don't think either one of us considers the other stupid, so don't do this.
This goes back to thing number 1, Hirschfeld wasn't one of his kind, plenty of his kind were exiled out of Germany and even more of his kind themselves immigrated, a lot of them to the USA, and coincidentally around the same time, the poison of pornography emerged and started spreading in the USA, a few decades later in the 60s, a certain organization ruled by a certain kind declassifies homosexuality as a mental illness, simultaneously the infamous sexual revolution begins, now feminists surely were part of it, but the academics behind it happened to have 1 crucial thing in common.
And woman worshipping is a very loose term with you, I can say that women have a role and place in a normal society, something that's been recorded throughout human history in different parts of the world and that is backed by basic biology, and you'll say I'm worshipping women, and don't pretend I'm not right.
It's still simping. Trannies will only improve the sporting value of women's joke sports anyway. Maybe they'll have a player who can score a dunk in the WNBA one day.
Yes. Remind me, how did women treat male spaces? What are we currently going through with their presence in gyms? You're a fucking simp if you lift a finger for adult women, they don't deserve anything. At least protecting kids is morally right. Protecting women is just being a mark for the same con they pull over and over again.
They aren't against trannies. They're against trannies being classed as women legally. Women's entire cheated achievements balance on that legal definition and they have to protect it.
The war between TERFs and "regular feminists" is simply a war of "do we cut their dicks off or kill them all?"
Because they took the tradcon deal of having a simp each.
No, because women were given what they wanted. Endless rewards just for existing and protecting from the deserved consequences of their earlier actions.
Andrea Dworkin was a Jew, you're not even ideologically consistent. She was also pro-tranny, which makes this argument doubly hilarious.
Anyone who unironically says this retardation, built on women's lack of desire for any kind of competition in the marketplace because of how poorly they perform against it, has drunk so much kool-aid they need to go to the ER.
Except they didn't. You're really, really reaching now and it's honestly hilarious.
It's literally in Solanas' manifesto, as taught in Women's Studies, that transgenderism must be revived to "fix men".
There are a ridiculous number of examples that prove it definitively.
Women popularized a dead ideology that came from medical experiments performed by post-war surgeons because they wanted to destroy everything that is male, at all costs.