Their angle is to bring up that only so much of the total is being shown, and thus is an editorialized take. As if anyone can just play 40,000 hours continuously, so anyone showing anything from these tapes is just pushing an agenda. If you haven't consumed the entire quantity, then they judge you as incapable of making a qualitative judgement about it, and you're just a propagandist.
It's actually a good mental trap that will fool retards. Now the rank and file can ignore anything and everything because they have been given the postmodern interpretation argument that any display of this footage is always one pushing their personal agenda. The allegation that Tucker is only showing .0-whatever-% of the total film makes one naturally asks the question what is in the remaining tape, regardless of the quality or importance of what he was showing in what he did select.
Their angle is to bring up that only so much of the total is being shown, and thus is an editorialized take. As if anyone can just play 40,000 hours continuously, so anyone showing anything from these tapes is just pushing an agenda. If you haven't consumed the entire quantity, then they judge you as incapable of making a qualitative judgement about it, and you're just a propagandist.
It's actually a good mental trap that will fool retards. Now the rank and file can ignore anything and everything because they have been given the postmodern interpretation argument that any display of this footage is always one pushing their personal agenda. The allegation that Tucker is only showing .0-whatever-% of the total film makes one naturally asks the question what is in the remaining tape, regardless of the quality or importance of what he was showing in what he did select.
They were fine with making judgements based on the "enhanced" footage provided during their little sham trial.
They don't think that. They think they exist within the liberal superposition of being "objectively" correct.
And on the right side of history.