Not a HP fan but I can imagine the game being a woke pile of shit AND highly respecting of the source material. It's not a particularly "based" property. So HP fans are already neck deep in it, might as well keep swimming.
That and every competent male being forced out of the storyline or/ and just outright killed off. The entire series was a “bumbling dad, smart graceful amazing mom commercial”
Let's make a list of "Competent males in the series"
Harry - Was stated in the books to be good with his spellwork, and a match for Voldemort. Survives the series
Dumbledore - Most powerful sorcerer in the world, who only died because he was cursed by Voldemort who placed a powerful compulsion charm on a ring that he might have known held a Deathly Hallow, something he among a small number of people Dumbledore was searching for.
Filius Flitwick - one of the best professors in the school, survives
Hagrid - competent with magical creatures, a great guy, survives
Let's see who dies though
Snape - total prick, good at potions and a spy, but still dies to Voldemort
Mad-Eye Moody, aged ex-auror, in the battle of the seven potters is killed by Voldemort
Sirius Black - Harry's godfather, taken out by Bellatrix
Remus Lupin - married to Tonks, he is taken out by Dolohov in a double battle with Bellatrix Lestrange killing Tonks
So of the competent males, the ones who actually expressed some level of proficiency in the series, of the 4 killed two were taken out by the main villain, another taken out by a psycho witch who was stated to be incredibly dangerous, while Remus lost to another wizard who was also a member of Voldemorts inner circle and thus considered dangerous.
Notice I didn't mention Ron or Neville, because they weren't written out of the story and had large parts to play in events.
Look you can be pissy all you want about the leftist writing in the HP franchise but in no way was the entire series "bumbling dad, smart graceful amazing mom commercial"
Of the families we do see on screen or mentioned in the books, the Potters, James fought off Voldemort to buy time for his wife and child to escape, Lily dies to protect Harry. The Weasleys are shown in the books to be a loving family and at worst Arthur is muggle obsessed but still good at his job.
About the only families that are shown to be bad are the Malfoys. Explicitly family, husband, wife and children.
Is this referring to the bumbling idiot of a headmaster and the weasley teacher? i noticed it watching on youtube there is a strong "girls rule boys drool" narrative being pushed in the game with the african girl and the im-not-a-poacher girl being the smartest and pure hearted where else the snake house guy keeps fucking up and at the end of his questline he has to grovel for the rest of life for fucking up. The whole thing is trash writing in my opinion.
Nah, it was Harry getting briefly involved with one of the Paki sisters. Fortunately, he smartened up later.
So far in the game, the only mention of "purebloods" had to do with a mention of someone with the surname Gaunt, which would be one of Tom Riddle's direct ancestors, anyway. At the time, it should have been considered nothing more than a mere personal choice as to whom one married; I seem to recall the books laying the whole pureblood thing directly on Voldemort's shoulders (as being a shit-raiser.) At worst, it would have been looked at in a more tribalist sense before Darwin, in the same sense that royal families made the mistake of wanting to keep things to the nearest family possible, or the multi-generational cousin-marriage we see in modern tribalist societies (which would make sense given that they're all literally inter-related, with maybe very little fresh blood, such as the Grangers.)
Not a HP fan but I can imagine the game being a woke pile of shit AND highly respecting of the source material. It's not a particularly "based" property. So HP fans are already neck deep in it, might as well keep swimming.
Here’s the rub, HP was a woke pile of feminist garbage to begin with. It’s why the main consumer base is mid thirties women and male feminists
i always thought the main woke part of harry potter was the whole demonizing of people who want to keep their race pure. You know, the pure bloods
That and every competent male being forced out of the storyline or/ and just outright killed off. The entire series was a “bumbling dad, smart graceful amazing mom commercial”
Let's make a list of "Competent males in the series" Harry - Was stated in the books to be good with his spellwork, and a match for Voldemort. Survives the series Dumbledore - Most powerful sorcerer in the world, who only died because he was cursed by Voldemort who placed a powerful compulsion charm on a ring that he might have known held a Deathly Hallow, something he among a small number of people Dumbledore was searching for. Filius Flitwick - one of the best professors in the school, survives Hagrid - competent with magical creatures, a great guy, survives
Let's see who dies though Snape - total prick, good at potions and a spy, but still dies to Voldemort Mad-Eye Moody, aged ex-auror, in the battle of the seven potters is killed by Voldemort Sirius Black - Harry's godfather, taken out by Bellatrix Remus Lupin - married to Tonks, he is taken out by Dolohov in a double battle with Bellatrix Lestrange killing Tonks
So of the competent males, the ones who actually expressed some level of proficiency in the series, of the 4 killed two were taken out by the main villain, another taken out by a psycho witch who was stated to be incredibly dangerous, while Remus lost to another wizard who was also a member of Voldemorts inner circle and thus considered dangerous.
Notice I didn't mention Ron or Neville, because they weren't written out of the story and had large parts to play in events.
Look you can be pissy all you want about the leftist writing in the HP franchise but in no way was the entire series "bumbling dad, smart graceful amazing mom commercial"
Of the families we do see on screen or mentioned in the books, the Potters, James fought off Voldemort to buy time for his wife and child to escape, Lily dies to protect Harry. The Weasleys are shown in the books to be a loving family and at worst Arthur is muggle obsessed but still good at his job.
About the only families that are shown to be bad are the Malfoys. Explicitly family, husband, wife and children.
Is this referring to the bumbling idiot of a headmaster and the weasley teacher? i noticed it watching on youtube there is a strong "girls rule boys drool" narrative being pushed in the game with the african girl and the im-not-a-poacher girl being the smartest and pure hearted where else the snake house guy keeps fucking up and at the end of his questline he has to grovel for the rest of life for fucking up. The whole thing is trash writing in my opinion.
Nah, it was Harry getting briefly involved with one of the Paki sisters. Fortunately, he smartened up later.
So far in the game, the only mention of "purebloods" had to do with a mention of someone with the surname Gaunt, which would be one of Tom Riddle's direct ancestors, anyway. At the time, it should have been considered nothing more than a mere personal choice as to whom one married; I seem to recall the books laying the whole pureblood thing directly on Voldemort's shoulders (as being a shit-raiser.) At worst, it would have been looked at in a more tribalist sense before Darwin, in the same sense that royal families made the mistake of wanting to keep things to the nearest family possible, or the multi-generational cousin-marriage we see in modern tribalist societies (which would make sense given that they're all literally inter-related, with maybe very little fresh blood, such as the Grangers.)