You first, Narita. It's only fair. After all, it's a policy you're endorsing, so you should be the first to fulfill it, right? If it's as wonderful as you suggest, then you should have no problems with this. You've had a good run. No need to continue on, eh?
...he won't, of course. Cowards like this have no end of excuses, and always expect other people to be the ones paying the price.
first they give some bullshit generic reasons on why that apply to a lot of people. but as those no longer apply, they still exempt themselves anyways. look at what bill gates said about climate communism... he argues everyone needs to be locked down and banned from driving and flying... except it's okay when he does it.
Well, there's your problem right there. I doubt Dr. Narita, 67 will share the same opinions as his younger self. It's very easy to talk about sacrificing for the greater good when you intend for someone else to be doing the sacrifice.
The possibility of making it mandatory in the future,
Bioethicists would-be philosophers who advocate for that sort of thing first, then we look at how it went and decide if we want to continue. How's that sound?
You first, Narita. It's only fair. After all, it's a policy you're endorsing, so you should be the first to fulfill it, right? If it's as wonderful as you suggest, then you should have no problems with this. You've had a good run. No need to continue on, eh?
...he won't, of course. Cowards like this have no end of excuses, and always expect other people to be the ones paying the price.
Disgusting.
except they don't believe in it for themselves.
first they give some bullshit generic reasons on why that apply to a lot of people. but as those no longer apply, they still exempt themselves anyways. look at what bill gates said about climate communism... he argues everyone needs to be locked down and banned from driving and flying... except it's okay when he does it.
"mandatory euthanasia"
Well, there's your problem right there. I doubt Dr. Narita, 67 will share the same opinions as his younger self. It's very easy to talk about sacrificing for the greater good when you intend for someone else to be doing the sacrifice.
Bioethicists would-be philosophers who advocate for that sort of thing first, then we look at how it went and decide if we want to continue. How's that sound?