This one is just two sides speaking past each other. Progressives believe that biological women can legitimately identify as men, and so “men” can obviously become pregnant. Conservatives believe biological women cannot legitimately identify as men, and so “men” obviously cannot become pregnant.
Progressives think you are “insane” for saying men cannot get pregnant because the implication of this assertion is that women cannot identity as men. The progressive argument for “pregnant men” is one that assumes progressive victory in a preceding argument. This is a tactic known as “assuming the sale”, except it is being applied to manufactured consent rather than sales.
This one is just two sides speaking past each other. Progressives believe that biological women can legitimately identify as men, and so “men” can obviously become pregnant. Conservatives believe biological women cannot legitimately identify as men, and so “men” obviously cannot become pregnant.
Progressives think you are “insane” for saying men cannot get pregnant because the implication of this assertion is that women cannot identity as men. The progressive argument for “pregnant men” is one that assumes progressive victory in a preceding argument. This is a tactic known as “assuming the sale”, except it is being applied to manufactured consent rather than sales.
They have the knowledge that men are not women but not the conviction to believe it.
I’ve heard them try to use that logic but it still sounds silly for them to twist themselves into knots. Didn’t know the name for that tactic. Thanks.