The original post you posted specifically said "men without children." Get the fuck out if you can't maintain a train of thought across a single thread. Maybe go to twitter where you'll be appreciated.
There's nothing to refute, it's a truism not an argument. Resources ARE finite, and so we CHOOSE to use them to do everything we can to promote secure and stable family units because that is the fundamental building block of every society.
Mind posting a refutation of my "resources are finite" position or are you just going to accuse me of being a bot like some sort of- bot.
In what way does "resources are finite" relate to men being able to have kids and spend a reasonable amount of time with them.
The original post you posted specifically said "men without children." Get the fuck out if you can't maintain a train of thought across a single thread. Maybe go to twitter where you'll be appreciated.
I see insults but absolutely nothing of an argument in there.
Literally 0. Nada. Nothing.
How would the generic "resources are infinite" even apply to men being able to spend some amount of time with their own children.
You: "men without children"
Also You: "men being able to spend some amount of time with their own children."
Do you see what I'm getting at here?
There's nothing to refute, it's a truism not an argument. Resources ARE finite, and so we CHOOSE to use them to do everything we can to promote secure and stable family units because that is the fundamental building block of every society.
lol because this totally won't primarily benefit single mothers