Let's just cut to the whole point. You're saying Tigers and Lions are the same species. Cool. Every single person on the planet considers them two distinct animals. Same species or not. No one thinks of Tigers and Lions as being the same. They hunt differently, the look completely different, they live in different areas. Everyone just understands they're a type of big cat but they are a distinct animal.
All I'm trying to get at is that humans are the same. A negro, an asian and an aryan are distinct animals. We are not the same. We are as different as a lion and a tiger more-or-less. However, that is not what most people think. Most people think if it weren't for Male Lion Supremacy oppressing the Tiger, that the two animals would be identical in every regard except the color of its fur. This is simply not true.
All I'm suggesting is maybe we encounter an alien as different as a Lion is from a Tiger but another humanoid as different from humans on Earth that no one could deny they were distinctly a different "animal" like how no one disputes that a Lion or Tiger is different.
Humans are NOT all the same. A white guy with expensive equipment DOES hunt differently from a fucking Sentinelese. Anyone thinking some numbnuts modern Inuit with his high powered rifle, Goretex tent, and Fucking Snowmobile is doing anything at all fucking "traditional" is a goddamned retard.
Sigh. I'm arguing that BEHAVIOUR is a horrible way to define species, and only a retarded fucking creationist would even think of doing it that way.
Behavior is the most important way to define species. Let's take the black bear and the grizzly bear. If you encounter a black bear in the woods, you are supposed to make lots of noise to scare it away. If you encounter a brown bear in the woods, you are supposed to play dead. Do you imagine the difference between the behavior of the black bear and brown bear has to do with the sophisticated technology the brown bear has? I mean, clearly the brown bear has high powered rifles which is why he doesn't run away when you make lots of noise compared to a black bear... right? lol... Animals have genetic predispositions toward certain behaviors and that's the most important aspect of the differences between races, not the color of their fur.
If you define species at the point where only things of the same species can interbreed then all race is, is just a subspecies. At the end of the day, how you end up labeling things doesn't matter. All that matters is that there are behavioral differences at the genetic level between humans which can be group together among averages that correlate between different groups of people, usually distinguishable by physical qualities.
Everyone was a creationist in the 1700's, and almost all scientists were Christians. Even today half of scientists remain religious. Linne's taxonomy was created more than a hundred years before the Origin of Species. It's not fair to judge him based on modern standards.
Yes, I know, but I can judge the science assholes who never altered his bullshit or even QUESTIONED it until genetics research started in the 1990s. And still the coyote still isn't classed as Canis lupus latrans when it fucking bloody well should be. (Actually, the species names should be latrans, if the coyote has the grandfather genetics for wolves and dogs). Among other stupidities left over from the Creationist era.
You also have the double-think types who say they "believe in" evolution by selection, but then turn around and treat "all humans are created equal" like a biological truism rather than a legal tenet ...
Let's just cut to the whole point. You're saying Tigers and Lions are the same species. Cool. Every single person on the planet considers them two distinct animals. Same species or not. No one thinks of Tigers and Lions as being the same. They hunt differently, the look completely different, they live in different areas. Everyone just understands they're a type of big cat but they are a distinct animal.
All I'm trying to get at is that humans are the same. A negro, an asian and an aryan are distinct animals. We are not the same. We are as different as a lion and a tiger more-or-less. However, that is not what most people think. Most people think if it weren't for Male Lion Supremacy oppressing the Tiger, that the two animals would be identical in every regard except the color of its fur. This is simply not true.
All I'm suggesting is maybe we encounter an alien as different as a Lion is from a Tiger but another humanoid as different from humans on Earth that no one could deny they were distinctly a different "animal" like how no one disputes that a Lion or Tiger is different.
Humans are NOT all the same. A white guy with expensive equipment DOES hunt differently from a fucking Sentinelese. Anyone thinking some numbnuts modern Inuit with his high powered rifle, Goretex tent, and Fucking Snowmobile is doing anything at all fucking "traditional" is a goddamned retard.
Sigh. I'm arguing that BEHAVIOUR is a horrible way to define species, and only a retarded fucking creationist would even think of doing it that way.
Behavior is the most important way to define species. Let's take the black bear and the grizzly bear. If you encounter a black bear in the woods, you are supposed to make lots of noise to scare it away. If you encounter a brown bear in the woods, you are supposed to play dead. Do you imagine the difference between the behavior of the black bear and brown bear has to do with the sophisticated technology the brown bear has? I mean, clearly the brown bear has high powered rifles which is why he doesn't run away when you make lots of noise compared to a black bear... right? lol... Animals have genetic predispositions toward certain behaviors and that's the most important aspect of the differences between races, not the color of their fur.
Yeah, and if I see a nigger or paki, I run the fucking other way.
But the two bears can still interbreed. Just like WASPs, niggers, and pakis can.
How humans are supposed to react to something is a SHITTY way of defining species.
But it's a GREAT way of defining RACE. Humans RACES exist, I never denied they're one species with MANY RACES.
If you define species at the point where only things of the same species can interbreed then all race is, is just a subspecies. At the end of the day, how you end up labeling things doesn't matter. All that matters is that there are behavioral differences at the genetic level between humans which can be group together among averages that correlate between different groups of people, usually distinguishable by physical qualities.
Everyone was a creationist in the 1700's, and almost all scientists were Christians. Even today half of scientists remain religious. Linne's taxonomy was created more than a hundred years before the Origin of Species. It's not fair to judge him based on modern standards.
Yes, I know, but I can judge the science assholes who never altered his bullshit or even QUESTIONED it until genetics research started in the 1990s. And still the coyote still isn't classed as Canis lupus latrans when it fucking bloody well should be. (Actually, the species names should be latrans, if the coyote has the grandfather genetics for wolves and dogs). Among other stupidities left over from the Creationist era.
You also have the double-think types who say they "believe in" evolution by selection, but then turn around and treat "all humans are created equal" like a biological truism rather than a legal tenet ...