Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
NoNewNormal
MillionDollarExtreme
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
Win uses cookies, which are essential for the site to function. We don't want your data, nor do we share it with anyone. I accept.
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

20
Ironic that the Tates are outspoken anti-feminists and yet they face conviction only because the judge doesn't believe the women in case. (archive.ph)
posted 46 days ago by onetruephilosoraptor 46 days ago by onetruephilosoraptor +21 / -1
18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 19 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 19 points 46 days ago +19 / -0

Believe all women who say things that the regime finds useful. The last 8 words are silent. That's why any woman who gets raped by a tranny is considered a lying TERF and "lived experiences" that don't support the agenda are dismissed despite that supposedly being a high crime against feminism.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor [S] 8 points 46 days ago +8 / -0

Yeah, their rules clearly change depending on the individuals in question.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture 12 points 46 days ago +12 / -0

Yes, the reason they were convicted is because the judge didn't believe the woman and nothing to do with behind the scenes corruption. If this judgement doesn't prove there's a lot more going on to the Tate's case then you're blind. Clearly some shadowy forces, probably some Americans, are involved and have paid off some people. The corruption involved in this reeks.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 13 points 46 days ago +13 / -0

I'm starting to wonder if the people who say he was was deliberately propped up so they could knock him down were correct all along. It's odd that the media gave this guy in particular all that attention when there are plenty of Manosphere guys dropping red pills who don't openly insult their followers. I think he was supposed to be a feminist caricature of a red piller and became way bigger than they expected him to because the feminists' complete lack of credibility just made him bigger when they tried to take him down.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor [S] 8 points 46 days ago +8 / -0

Whoever is behind this psy-op was likely trying to demoralize young men.

They prop up the Tates as a role-model for masculinity then they destroy them as a warning of some sorts.

The whole Tate bros backstory and life feels like a story arc not just events that organically happened.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor [S] 12 points 46 days ago +12 / -0

The Tates' background, their rise to fame, this case and their downfall. It all feels off.

Feels like some kind of psy-op.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 46 days ago +2 / -0
▲ -5 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture -5 points 46 days ago +4 / -9

Kind of feels like he made a deal with the Jews to get propped up as controlled opposition, similar to a Jordan Peterson, but the Tates reneged on their end of the bargain and are now being punished for it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -7 ▼
– TheImpossible1 -7 points 46 days ago +2 / -9

Don't you mean women? It's women that prop up controlled opposition anti-feminists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture 10 points 46 days ago +11 / -1

Ah yes, those powerful women:

  • George Soros
  • Larry Fink
  • Antony Blinken
  • Ben Bernanke
  • David René de Rothschild
  • Dominique Strauss-Kahn
  • Michael Bloomberg
  • Mark Zuckerberg
  • Jeff Zucker
  • Lee Rosenberg
  • Thomas Friedman

We can go on forever. But you somehow think there's a group of women in the shadows running the show. Wake up dude.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -6 ▼
– TheImpossible1 -6 points 46 days ago +1 / -7

powerful

Bloomberg

The guy who couldn't even win a single delegate in the DNC Primary?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture 8 points 46 days ago +9 / -1

And 99% of women in this world can't even get 1 vote in a municipal election, so what? The guy's a billionaire. That's power and influence. Jews make up 2% of the USA, yet 40% of billionaire are Jews and Jews are over represented in every position of power within the government. The same cannot be said of women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -4 ▼
– TheImpossible1 -4 points 46 days ago +2 / -6

That's not even close to true. The amount of nobody women running for office on nothing but hating men is absurdly high.

They don't need to be represented. They can just rule from the shadows like in the UK, which was confirmed by party insiders.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 6 ▼
– trump4045 6 points 46 days ago +9 / -3

One of the things that I noticed about a lot of the male influencers in the Tate circle is they are westerners living in Muslim countries, IE Uncle Mike (Mike Thurston) moving from London to Dubai and raving about its civility and lack of crime. And they are friendly with Muslims and routinely do podcasts together. Essentially using masculinity, status, and wealth to bridge the cap between Christianity and Islam. Forming an a Christian/Muslim alliance against the globalist machine.

Who could possibly take issue with that I wonder?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– current_horror 4 points 46 days ago +4 / -0

This is the correct take. We know the machine can destroy anyone at any time. We know they didn’t like Tate influencing young men and boys away from globohomo and feminism. Why didn’t they destroy him sooner? It appears the third rail is any behavior that threatens to unite the two biggest world religions against globalism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 46 days ago +2 / -0
▲ -5 ▼
– TheImpossible1 -5 points 46 days ago +1 / -6

Women already set up the fake anti-feminist Richard Reeves to take the heat off them, so they don't want some random stepping over the line and drawing attention away from their carefully crafted "men are suffering but it's not women's fault, they need to adapt to the new society" narrative.

permalink save report block reply

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2023.11.02 - 5kznb (status)

Copyright © 2023.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy