But didn't you hear? Traditional ideas are generally to be favored over crazy bullshit found in the present clown world. Except of course the extremely arbitrary age of 18 set by the US government to determine adulthood. That one is sacrosanct and if you even dare violate that sacred rule of the universe you are a monster.
My point stands completely unaffected because it exists completely independent of what you or anyone else perceives to be traditionalist. I didn't even use the term, I merely referenced a thought process that loosely aligns with it.
Aww, I thought you were taking a based stand that young girls are the property of their fathers and therefore consent is an irrelevant and ridiculous notion. I'm disappointed in you.
Again, where's the line? You say they can consent. Lots of children do things that aren't in their best interests, part of the whole idea of society is to prevent that stuff.
They already have sex with other teenagers or adults if given the chance.
And any adult taking advantage of that is a fucking creep. Just because there might be some sexual activity doesn't mean it's alright for adults to engage in that, or fucking get married to children.
I'm not making the argument for 12, though.
Why not though? What's the difference? Some twelve year olds have sex too, why shouldn't they be able to marry or whatever? See, that's what I'm talking about, where is the line? If you're saying it's fine at 14 because they have sex, why not younger?
But didn't you hear? Traditional ideas are generally to be favored over crazy bullshit found in the present clown world. Except of course the extremely arbitrary age of 18 set by the US government to determine adulthood. That one is sacrosanct and if you even dare violate that sacred rule of the universe you are a monster.
My point stands completely unaffected because it exists completely independent of what you or anyone else perceives to be traditionalist. I didn't even use the term, I merely referenced a thought process that loosely aligns with it.
The only people who said eighteen were you and someone who agrees with you.
I didn't say it, and neither did anyone arguing with you.
Why is there so much of this bullshit here?
You really think fourteen year olds have the the capacity to consent to marriage and sex? They're still children.
And, if it's lowered to that, what's to stop it from going lower? If it's fine at 14, why not 12? No thanks.
Aww, I thought you were taking a based stand that young girls are the property of their fathers and therefore consent is an irrelevant and ridiculous notion. I'm disappointed in you.
Again, where's the line? You say they can consent. Lots of children do things that aren't in their best interests, part of the whole idea of society is to prevent that stuff.
And any adult taking advantage of that is a fucking creep. Just because there might be some sexual activity doesn't mean it's alright for adults to engage in that, or fucking get married to children.
Why not though? What's the difference? Some twelve year olds have sex too, why shouldn't they be able to marry or whatever? See, that's what I'm talking about, where is the line? If you're saying it's fine at 14 because they have sex, why not younger?
Very good, you face wall now comrade.
ok groomer
As a pedophile you're more likely to be a sodomite. No one here believes that you'd stop at 14. You just wrongly assumed we'd agree with you