Some good info here, but the presenter is coming from an extremely anti-Tate position. I'm no fan of Tate, but this dude is, among other things, uncritically taking a Reddit libtard female teacher at her word that Tate is poisoning the youth. Think of the children!
I'm going to hold my initial impression that pretty much everyone involved is a retarded scumbag. There are no good guys on this one. And this presenter is obnoxious.
But you're always telling me that coomers are victims and what not. By your standards, this guy is a coomer genocider for stripping those suckers out of their assets. What makes this good all of a sudden?
The difference is, unlike the women, he's actually pushing young men not to be the perfect targets for his racket, while women...are just grooming a massive amount of simps to exploit.
He's far from the perfect guy, but he resonates with young people better than anyone else trying to counter women's brainwashing apparatus.
The difference is, unlike the women, he's actually pushing young men not to be the perfect targets for his racket
So it's OK that he's running a racket because he makes noises about how you should not fall for rackets? Even though he sells a complete con job which he advertises with expensive cars (which he gets by selling his con job to suckers)?
he resonates with young people better than anyone else trying to counter women's brainwashing apparatus.
I still don't get how you are seething mad over some woman getting $20 a month on OnlyFans, while you give this guy a pass for doing it on an industrial scale.
Like I said, he's not an ideal person, but he's who we have.
Letting the enemy take him down just helps them. I'd gladly trade his downfall for JK Rowling's 10+ years overdue one though. Only a few days until we find out how many people fell for her psyop.
I still don't get how you are seething mad over some woman getting $20 a month on OnlyFans
Because women created these broken people to exploit. It makes the whole thing far more evil when you realize they caused the same thing they're profiting off.
Some good info here, but the presenter is coming from an extremely anti-Tate position. I'm no fan of Tate, but this dude is, among other things, uncritically taking a Reddit libtard female teacher at her word that Tate is poisoning the youth. Think of the children!
I'm going to hold my initial impression that pretty much everyone involved is a retarded scumbag. There are no good guys on this one. And this presenter is obnoxious.
Yeah, he probably should have not included the reddit teacher bullshit.
Oh, he is "poisoning the youth", in the sense that he's ruining their plans for the youth.
Women can't stand the idea that the boys they groomed might not be mindless simps.
Just a while back, you were calling Tate a deep state plant, or something like that.
And now you're a big fan, despite hyperventilating about OnlyFans 24/7.
I didn't trust him until he was arrested.
The fact that the enemy used their favorite tactic proves they consider him a threat.
But you're always telling me that coomers are victims and what not. By your standards, this guy is a coomer genocider for stripping those suckers out of their assets. What makes this good all of a sudden?
The women don't get the money?
I'm only half kidding on that.
The difference is, unlike the women, he's actually pushing young men not to be the perfect targets for his racket, while women...are just grooming a massive amount of simps to exploit.
He's far from the perfect guy, but he resonates with young people better than anyone else trying to counter women's brainwashing apparatus.
So it's OK that he's running a racket because he makes noises about how you should not fall for rackets? Even though he sells a complete con job which he advertises with expensive cars (which he gets by selling his con job to suckers)?
I still don't get how you are seething mad over some woman getting $20 a month on OnlyFans, while you give this guy a pass for doing it on an industrial scale.
Like I said, he's not an ideal person, but he's who we have.
Letting the enemy take him down just helps them. I'd gladly trade his downfall for JK Rowling's 10+ years overdue one though. Only a few days until we find out how many people fell for her psyop.
Because women created these broken people to exploit. It makes the whole thing far more evil when you realize they caused the same thing they're profiting off.
I'm shocked, shocked that a guy who converted to Islam and peddles fake 'get rich quick' schemes is... bad.
So the pornographer who measures his value by his wealth turned out to be a scumbag and not a good role model? Wow! Who could have seen this coming!?
Tate is a fucktard. Not shocking at all
Yawn. Anyone women hate is a good person, it works 99% of the time.
Here's a woman hating on Tate by claiming that he was built up for nefarious reasons: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZqU7uaDC/x/c/4ToipugYi94
Like nearly everyone I've only heard of tate because feminist types pushed him.
He has the same energy as women-centered shows tend to have. Jerry Springer, Maury, Oprah, Daytime Soaps.
I feel like the thing around him is more that he entertains younger women, thus is a competitor to feminist messaging towards women.
Yes, yes, bad take ages badly.
LOL. You took it surprisingly well.
It's difficult to form an opinion of someone you've barely heard of and have it age well.
I've done some research and I believe he was set up, so I'm taking his side.