Tinder reveals new $500 a month service for ‘motivated daters’
(www.the-sun.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Very true. The top 5% of "Chad" guys get like 80-90% of the pussy.
You need to be "good enough" looking to be able to get women even at a lower than average probability. All Tinder can do is boost you and advertise you, they can't make women fuck you. It's like Youtube showing your content to a lot of people.
So what are you paying for?
Being able to get "trophy" fucks of hot women who were very low probability, thanks to Tinder boosting you from a 0.1% chance to maybe a 10% chance and you putting in the money/work to close the deal.
Being able to rack up a body count of tinder sloots.
Having the ego boost from getting it "for free", supposedly from your own merits and prowess, instead of paying for it.
possibly find a "sugar baby" or some other kind of mentally disordered girl who will exchange her meaty flaps for your money on a regular basis.
If all you care about is sex, and not ego, then prostitutes are probably better because you can read reviews and be selective based on lots of criteria. Most men want to feel desired and loved and are more strongly motivated by ego than lust, though.
If we wanted to discuss what an actual "useful" service might be for $500/month, there are things that could work.
Tinder has the data for this. Imagine if Tinder analyzed your photos you uploaded and told you how effective each photo was at attracting women? Then went further and made suggestions like (you need to smile more in your photos), you have too many photos with other men, you have too many photos with fish in them etc... It would need to be some very sophisticated picture AI detection to start giving suggestions but for $500/month, you should be getting these sorts of features.
Furthermore, imagine if you got a match and Tinder gave you specific details of that specific user your were matching. Our algorithm has calculated that this user has a 70% chance of unmatching people who type long sentences compared to people who type short sentences. Based on the user you've matched with's match history, she is 7x more likely to match with men who have pictures of fish on their profile than the average woman, we suggest you talk about fishing with her.
Stuff like that might actually help some guys out tbh. One of the biggest things I did to improve my Tinder was getting professional photos done. Prior to getting professional photos done, I literally bought premium then swiped right to every single woman in the city, I did this for days for months and literally got 0 dates from it. I got professional photos taken and immediately I was getting matches. Photos make a huge difference and most guys aren't good at taking photos because most guys don't spend their teenage years literally perfecting their photo taking to get attention like women do. I think most guys don't actually realize how bad their photos are so if Tinder can analyze this and start telling guys what to do to fix their photos, that would help men get laid more, or at least a certain segment of men (average guys). Different photos can't fix fat and ugly obviously but maybe the guys would be more attractive to fat and ugly women even.
This is a good summary of the situation. Of course red pilled men know that only Chad gets anything close to be being "desired and loved", so they know that the prostitute is the better option unless they think they can become Chad.