Lots of people discuss all the gynocratic societies in the world. I'm wondering, what is the most Male-Friendly country in the world. Is it Afghanistan? Are there better countries for men?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
For men looking to fuck attractive women as cheaply and low risk as possible. Including the possibility of marrying one and keeping her around.
Okay, there is a serious answer to this question.
If your concern is getting all of your shit and your kids taken when the woman you married gets caught banging Tyrone; there is an actual, well thought out answer.
You can regularly visit either the Dominican Republic or the Philippines. Cost of living is low, women are old fashioned "traditional". There are lots of very pretty, nice, faithful ladies around who will be thrilled to spend time with you.
There are also lots of sluts who just want your money, but that is on you.
Find a great woman. Get a cheap apartment, set up a second home. Send an allowance every month to your lady. You can have kids whenever you want.
If you have a decent job, you can visit more than four times a year. You can video chat every night.
If she is unfaithful, just stop paying the rent and cut off her allowance. The kid is her problem, with no consequences.
If she is everything you hoped she would be, by the time your kid is in high school you can make arraignments for her and your kid to get citizenship to the USA. Marry her or whatever. Help your daughter get an apprenticeship as a specialist plumber or refrigeration mechanic. Help your kid start a business. Retire to the Dominican Republic.
This method lets you reward a good and faithful partner, it is affordable and the flights are cheap. It basically fixes the marriage contract.
The hard part is to not settle down with the first woman who throws her pussy at you. Don't have a kid until you really, really mean it. Being a father is incredibly rewarding, but walking out on your child is fucking brutal, even if there are no consequences for you, even if the mother deserves it, for whatever reason.
Do NOT settle for a woman who already has kids. Don't raise someone else's child.
Does this answer your question?
Not a bad idea actually.
What a lame definition of "male-friendly". It shows how cucked even so called "red-pilled" men are. Sex is a drive like hunger. It's not necessarily wrong to strive to obtain sex, but making it the most important aspect of a man's life is akin to a fatty putting all their effort into obtaining more cheap tasty food.
Most men in western countries at least have absolutely everything else worth pursuing.
So Afghanistan is better for men than a Western country with "absolutely everything else worth pursuing" because it provides access to cheap pussy?
Yes, that could very well be true.
Probably Nevada. Hookers are legal there.
There's nowhere where marriage is good because the system is built on an inherently flawed premise - that having a woman is a net gain.
The price of hookers in Nevada is too high. Reasonable prices would be something like $60/h not $400. However, any country with reasonably priced prostitutes only works if you have a mobile job and are paid in USD. If you're paid in the going currency there at an average job, they're more expensive than Nevada.
I guess your idea of male friendly is probably whichever country makes women work the most, taxes them the most and then gives all the benefit to men. So you think western society is close to the ideal? That's pretty laughable imo.
Take the Taliban for example that are allowed to take on sex slaves from their enemies. You don't think women in this case are beneficial? That's free prostitutes. The second they become a liability you can kill them. How isn't that beneficial?
But for the extra money, you're safe from the woman trying to do typical woman things. Although, if I'm being honest, I think paying women to tolerate you for a while is a stupid way to spend money.
Not too far off, honestly. First place to slap a 90% tax on OnlyFans "earnings" gets my permanent residency.
Not really, minus women's abuse of power, Western ideas fit perfectly with a pro-male society.
If you could repeal everything passed with the support of women's groups, you could build a stable pro-male society - as long as you made sure women couldn't get back to their current position.
Because I'm not an evil person, I don't desire to hold people captive. I want to be left alone and free from women's discriminatory push against me. I don't want them in my life, not even if you paid me.
Is it evil to turn women, who by your own admission are net liabilities for men, into net assets for men? That sounds like something a good person would do. Why let net liabilities continue to exist as net liabilities? Turn them into assets so all the existing assets benefit from these liabilities. That's a net gain for your society as a whole.
What exactly are the feminist laws you don't agree with you think need to be repealed?