Lots of people discuss all the gynocratic societies in the world. I'm wondering, what is the most Male-Friendly country in the world. Is it Afghanistan? Are there better countries for men?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Probably Nevada. Hookers are legal there.
There's nowhere where marriage is good because the system is built on an inherently flawed premise - that having a woman is a net gain.
The price of hookers in Nevada is too high. Reasonable prices would be something like $60/h not $400. However, any country with reasonably priced prostitutes only works if you have a mobile job and are paid in USD. If you're paid in the going currency there at an average job, they're more expensive than Nevada.
I guess your idea of male friendly is probably whichever country makes women work the most, taxes them the most and then gives all the benefit to men. So you think western society is close to the ideal? That's pretty laughable imo.
Take the Taliban for example that are allowed to take on sex slaves from their enemies. You don't think women in this case are beneficial? That's free prostitutes. The second they become a liability you can kill them. How isn't that beneficial?
But for the extra money, you're safe from the woman trying to do typical woman things. Although, if I'm being honest, I think paying women to tolerate you for a while is a stupid way to spend money.
Not too far off, honestly. First place to slap a 90% tax on OnlyFans "earnings" gets my permanent residency.
Not really, minus women's abuse of power, Western ideas fit perfectly with a pro-male society.
If you could repeal everything passed with the support of women's groups, you could build a stable pro-male society - as long as you made sure women couldn't get back to their current position.
Because I'm not an evil person, I don't desire to hold people captive. I want to be left alone and free from women's discriminatory push against me. I don't want them in my life, not even if you paid me.
Is it evil to turn women, who by your own admission are net liabilities for men, into net assets for men? That sounds like something a good person would do. Why let net liabilities continue to exist as net liabilities? Turn them into assets so all the existing assets benefit from these liabilities. That's a net gain for your society as a whole.
What exactly are the feminist laws you don't agree with you think need to be repealed?
You're close to sounding like them talking about us, you know.
As much as I talk about high ground not being worth it, there has to be some difference between their sadistic beliefs on what we push for.
Pretty much all family law needs to go. Sex discrimination law is utterly worthless, women have openly discriminated in hiring and now woman-led ESG funds are lending money based off reducing male hires. It needs to go, giving companies a chance to say no to them. We don't need to completely tear society down, just make common sense changes to reduce their power heavily.