It is easier to fool a man than it is to convince him he has been made a fool of.
This "vaccine" has had what is perhaps the absolute worst efficacy to date for any vaccine available on the market. This is even when you compare it to the damn strain it was designed for, provided you actually analyze the result of the vaccine and not the clearly, and blatantly, falsified trials that they used.
What you just told them to do, is inject themselves with a poison that will, at best, do nothing of benefit for them. At worst it has the potential to outright kill them, and failing that, drastically alter their life for the worse.
2 years ago, I would have tentatively agreed with your statement, and even said as much back then. Repeating that statement as if nothing has changed is not just idiotic, it is malicious incompetence at best. You are telling people to inject themselves with poison. Period.
The data is now extremely available, both in terms of how garbage these "vaccines" were at doing there job, and at how dangerous they are. The only data we don't have, is whether or not they end up being excessively carcinogenic, and that is because it was physically impossible to perform such tests.
It is easier to fool a man than it is to convince him he has been made a fool of.
Correct. But don't think that it is just the establishment that is fooling people. The problem is that no one will feel ashamed of being fooled by the establishment. Those who were fooled by random blog posts, on the other hand, will feel massive amounts of cognitive dissonance.
This "vaccine" has had what is perhaps the absolute worst efficacy to date for any vaccine available on the market.
Efficacy against what? Infection or death/servere disease?
What you just told them to do, is inject themselves with a poison that will, at best, do nothing of benefit for them. At worst it has the potential to outright kill them, and failing that, drastically alter their life for the worse.
At best, do nothing? Even in the worst-case scenario, it provides fair protection against death and hospitalization.
2 years ago, I would have tentatively agreed with your statement, and even said as much back then. Repeating that statement as if nothing has changed is not just idiotic, it is malicious incompetence at best. You are telling people to inject themselves with poison. Period.
You just keep repeating the word 'poison' as if that establishes it. I think my advice has held up rather well.
The data is now extremely available, both in terms of how garbage these "vaccines" were at doing there job, and at how dangerous they are. The only data we don't have, is whether or not they end up being excessively carcinogenic, and that is because it was physically impossible to perform such tests.
I suspect that "the data" is cherrypicked and spun data. Basically, because you mistrust the establishment (as I do), you are very vulnerable to being manipulated by people who assert that the establishment has done something wrong.
Efficacy against what? Infection or death/servere disease?
Oh. You're one of those people. That was never the fucking claim, they lied about everything, and even the "protects against hospitalization/death" argument is falling apart. I love that language, too; "hospitalization and death," when they trot that out they're admitting it doesn't vaccinate at all.
Even in the worst-case scenario, it provides fair protection against death and hospitalization.
Hahahahaha. I hadn't even gotten there when I wrote my earlier thing, that's great. Again, I don't even believe that; vaccinated people are being hospitalized at at least near the same rate, and it's been rising. There's often already more vaccinated people hospitalized than non-vaxxed although, yes, not per capita...yet, in most places. I suspect we will see a full reversal at some point, though, where even taking into account the number of people vaxxed versus unvaxxed, more vaxxed people will be hospitalized and dying. If it's not already happened; we know how screwy their counting is. For example, if you get your fourth booserino and keel over with the needle literally in your arm, you're unvaxxed, since it hasn't been two weeks yet.
Basically, because you mistrust the establishment (as I do), you are very vulnerable to being manipulated by people who assert that the establishment has done something wrong.
The establishment is always doing something wrong, and we've already seen them do wrong about so many things surrounding the vaccine (data, mandates, studies, claims), I'd be absolutely shocked if they weren't also doing wrong with the vaccine itself.
Oh. You're one of those people. That was never the fucking claim, they lied about everything, and even the "protects against hospitalization/death" argument is falling apart. I love that language, too; "hospitalization and death," when they trot that out they're admitting it doesn't vaccinate at all.
Is it that rare? Our government spent the latter half of 2021 saying that people should get vaccinated because even after protection against infection wears off, it still provides very good protection against hospitalization and death. Which seemed to be true for delta.
Regardless of semantic discussions of what is or isn't a vaccine.
Again, I don't even believe that; vaccinated people are being hospitalized at at least near the same rate, and it's been rising. There's often already more vaccinated people hospitalized than non-vaxxed although, yes, not per capita...yet, in most places.
Why is it rising though? If it has no effect at all on hos/death, which is what some people claim but which you have only suggested might be the case, you'd have seen the same thing in late 2021. But all the statistics I reviewed showed otherwise. Of course, they could in theory be fraudulent, but I doubt it. It's the spin on the numbers where the lies can hide, or what numbers they provide, rather than the numbers themselves.
Now, what is the per capita hospitalization that you would expect from vaccinated vs. not, considering that most people who did not take the vaccine are young and healthy, and most will have gotten superior natural immunity anyway? The irony is that if only 60+ people had been vaccinated, you'd see that nearly all deaths would come from the vaccinated camp.
For example, if you get your fourth booserino and keel over with the needle literally in your arm, you're unvaxxed, since it hasn't been two weeks yet.
The information I reviewed, back when I gave the slightest damn about Covid, broke things down by 0 to 3 doses.
The establishment is always doing something wrong
Something? Many things. The question is: what things, because the mere fact of doing many things wrong, does not establish that any given thing is wrong. Just because the establishment lies, doesn't mean that say the Moon Landing was faked.
and we've already seen them do wrong about so many things surrounding the vaccine (data, mandates, studies, claims), I'd be absolutely shocked if they weren't also doing wrong with the vaccine itself.
I can almost guarantee you that they are. But it's probably not "the vaccine is poison", but more relatively mild shenanigans. That is to be expected.
...most people who did not take the vaccine are young and healthy, and most will have gotten superior natural immunity anyway? The irony is that if only 60+ people had been vaccinated, you'd see that nearly all deaths would come from the vaccinated camp.
But it wasn't only 60+ people who were vaccinated, and you wouldn't be seeing deaths in these numbers if the vaccine worked. If everyone 60+ was vaccinated, and the vaccine worked almost perfectly, you should see basically zero hospitalizations. As for natural immunity, considering the vulnerable are still being hospitalized even if they're vaccinated, perhaps they should have taken their chance naturally.
For example, if you get your fourth booserino and keel over with the needle literally in your arm, you're unvaxxed, since it hasn't been two weeks yet.
The information I reviewed, back when I gave the slightest damn about Covid, broke things down by 0 to 3 doses.
I wasn't trying to be specific, it was just an example. Point is, you're not considered vaccinated if you got vaccinated within two weeks, or if your "protection" has worn off. So you could have been jabbed 1, 2, 3, or 4 times, and yet still be considered unvaxxed for statistical purposes. That was my point.
But it's probably not "the vaccine is poison", but more relatively mild shenanigans.
As I said in another comment, compared to other vaccines, this one absolutely is poison. Whether it's as bad as some people fear remains to be seen, but this vaccine is an absolute disaster - and deadly and dangerous - compared to past vaccines.
It is easier to fool a man than it is to convince him he has been made a fool of.
This "vaccine" has had what is perhaps the absolute worst efficacy to date for any vaccine available on the market. This is even when you compare it to the damn strain it was designed for, provided you actually analyze the result of the vaccine and not the clearly, and blatantly, falsified trials that they used.
What you just told them to do, is inject themselves with a poison that will, at best, do nothing of benefit for them. At worst it has the potential to outright kill them, and failing that, drastically alter their life for the worse.
2 years ago, I would have tentatively agreed with your statement, and even said as much back then. Repeating that statement as if nothing has changed is not just idiotic, it is malicious incompetence at best. You are telling people to inject themselves with poison. Period.
The data is now extremely available, both in terms of how garbage these "vaccines" were at doing there job, and at how dangerous they are. The only data we don't have, is whether or not they end up being excessively carcinogenic, and that is because it was physically impossible to perform such tests.
Correct. But don't think that it is just the establishment that is fooling people. The problem is that no one will feel ashamed of being fooled by the establishment. Those who were fooled by random blog posts, on the other hand, will feel massive amounts of cognitive dissonance.
Efficacy against what? Infection or death/servere disease?
At best, do nothing? Even in the worst-case scenario, it provides fair protection against death and hospitalization.
You just keep repeating the word 'poison' as if that establishes it. I think my advice has held up rather well.
I suspect that "the data" is cherrypicked and spun data. Basically, because you mistrust the establishment (as I do), you are very vulnerable to being manipulated by people who assert that the establishment has done something wrong.
Oh. You're one of those people. That was never the fucking claim, they lied about everything, and even the "protects against hospitalization/death" argument is falling apart. I love that language, too; "hospitalization and death," when they trot that out they're admitting it doesn't vaccinate at all.
Hahahahaha. I hadn't even gotten there when I wrote my earlier thing, that's great. Again, I don't even believe that; vaccinated people are being hospitalized at at least near the same rate, and it's been rising. There's often already more vaccinated people hospitalized than non-vaxxed although, yes, not per capita...yet, in most places. I suspect we will see a full reversal at some point, though, where even taking into account the number of people vaxxed versus unvaxxed, more vaxxed people will be hospitalized and dying. If it's not already happened; we know how screwy their counting is. For example, if you get your fourth booserino and keel over with the needle literally in your arm, you're unvaxxed, since it hasn't been two weeks yet.
The establishment is always doing something wrong, and we've already seen them do wrong about so many things surrounding the vaccine (data, mandates, studies, claims), I'd be absolutely shocked if they weren't also doing wrong with the vaccine itself.
Is it that rare? Our government spent the latter half of 2021 saying that people should get vaccinated because even after protection against infection wears off, it still provides very good protection against hospitalization and death. Which seemed to be true for delta.
Regardless of semantic discussions of what is or isn't a vaccine.
Why is it rising though? If it has no effect at all on hos/death, which is what some people claim but which you have only suggested might be the case, you'd have seen the same thing in late 2021. But all the statistics I reviewed showed otherwise. Of course, they could in theory be fraudulent, but I doubt it. It's the spin on the numbers where the lies can hide, or what numbers they provide, rather than the numbers themselves.
Now, what is the per capita hospitalization that you would expect from vaccinated vs. not, considering that most people who did not take the vaccine are young and healthy, and most will have gotten superior natural immunity anyway? The irony is that if only 60+ people had been vaccinated, you'd see that nearly all deaths would come from the vaccinated camp.
The information I reviewed, back when I gave the slightest damn about Covid, broke things down by 0 to 3 doses.
Something? Many things. The question is: what things, because the mere fact of doing many things wrong, does not establish that any given thing is wrong. Just because the establishment lies, doesn't mean that say the Moon Landing was faked.
I can almost guarantee you that they are. But it's probably not "the vaccine is poison", but more relatively mild shenanigans. That is to be expected.
But it wasn't only 60+ people who were vaccinated, and you wouldn't be seeing deaths in these numbers if the vaccine worked. If everyone 60+ was vaccinated, and the vaccine worked almost perfectly, you should see basically zero hospitalizations. As for natural immunity, considering the vulnerable are still being hospitalized even if they're vaccinated, perhaps they should have taken their chance naturally.
I wasn't trying to be specific, it was just an example. Point is, you're not considered vaccinated if you got vaccinated within two weeks, or if your "protection" has worn off. So you could have been jabbed 1, 2, 3, or 4 times, and yet still be considered unvaxxed for statistical purposes. That was my point.
As I said in another comment, compared to other vaccines, this one absolutely is poison. Whether it's as bad as some people fear remains to be seen, but this vaccine is an absolute disaster - and deadly and dangerous - compared to past vaccines.