In an alternative universe where Trump won re-election, the title of this post is "Leftist media keeps attacking life-saving vaccine as 'producing clot shots' and speculates about it causing heart attacks"
Oh no, don't you dare lump me into that bullshit. I called out Trump many times, especially about the fucking clotshot when I found out it wasn't a vaccine but an experimental RNA drug.
I can't speak for you personally, but I can speak for the right generally: yeah, after he lost, they 'called him out'. If he had won and needed vaccine uptake, they'd be defending the vaccine and calling out the MSM for smearing it.
Cause people are hypocrites. Just like their view of the economy goes from 'good' to 'bad' the moment their candidate exits office, their view of the vaccine similarly shifts.
Why would that suddenly change in the scenario where Trump was re-elected?
Same reason the anti-vax leftists became pro-vax as soon as Biden entered office.
In an alternative universe where Trump won re-election, the jab might not have been mandated and might have been administered to only the elderly where it appears that it might have been helpful, and then your scenario might actually be correct.
But as usual with the "vaccine," your takes are self-serving pious bullshit.
the jab might not have been mandated and might have been administered to only the elderly where it appears that it might have been helpful, and then your scenario might actually be correct.
I'm glad to see that you are not crazy on the subject. Seems like the only two permissible opinions in America are either "the vaccine is poison" or "vaccinate everyone of every age and condition as many times as possible".
But as usual with the "vaccine," your takes are self-serving pious bullshit.
You are mistaken about that. I just don't like hypocrisy, and I don't like people who twist facts to fit their own narrative. I see a cripple fight with one group trying to deny any harmful effect of the vaccine, and another trying to justify their refusal to take the vaccine by calling it 'clotshot'.
Newsflash: you don't need to justify anything. If you don't want to take it, that's your choice, and it's to be respected. You don't need to make stuff up.
In an alternative universe where Trump won re-election, the title of this post is "Leftist media keeps attacking life-saving vaccine as 'producing clot shots' and speculates about it causing heart attacks"
Maybe from OANN. The MSM would be all over this shit, blaming Trump and speculating when he was going to die.
I mean your post. But yeah. The MSM would be attacking the vaccine and the right would be defending it.
Oh no, don't you dare lump me into that bullshit. I called out Trump many times, especially about the fucking clotshot when I found out it wasn't a vaccine but an experimental RNA drug.
I can't speak for you personally, but I can speak for the right generally: yeah, after he lost, they 'called him out'. If he had won and needed vaccine uptake, they'd be defending the vaccine and calling out the MSM for smearing it.
Not all. Just nearly all.
Cause people are hypocrites. Just like their view of the economy goes from 'good' to 'bad' the moment their candidate exits office, their view of the vaccine similarly shifts.
Same reason the anti-vax leftists became pro-vax as soon as Biden entered office.
In an alternative universe where Trump won re-election, the jab might not have been mandated and might have been administered to only the elderly where it appears that it might have been helpful, and then your scenario might actually be correct.
But as usual with the "vaccine," your takes are self-serving pious bullshit.
I'm glad to see that you are not crazy on the subject. Seems like the only two permissible opinions in America are either "the vaccine is poison" or "vaccinate everyone of every age and condition as many times as possible".
You are mistaken about that. I just don't like hypocrisy, and I don't like people who twist facts to fit their own narrative. I see a cripple fight with one group trying to deny any harmful effect of the vaccine, and another trying to justify their refusal to take the vaccine by calling it 'clotshot'.
Newsflash: you don't need to justify anything. If you don't want to take it, that's your choice, and it's to be respected. You don't need to make stuff up.
Yes? Those are people twisting facts to fit their own narrative.