the jab might not have been mandated and might have been administered to only the elderly where it appears that it might have been helpful, and then your scenario might actually be correct.
I'm glad to see that you are not crazy on the subject. Seems like the only two permissible opinions in America are either "the vaccine is poison" or "vaccinate everyone of every age and condition as many times as possible".
But as usual with the "vaccine," your takes are self-serving pious bullshit.
You are mistaken about that. I just don't like hypocrisy, and I don't like people who twist facts to fit their own narrative. I see a cripple fight with one group trying to deny any harmful effect of the vaccine, and another trying to justify their refusal to take the vaccine by calling it 'clotshot'.
Newsflash: you don't need to justify anything. If you don't want to take it, that's your choice, and it's to be respected. You don't need to make stuff up.
I'm glad to see that you are not crazy on the subject. Seems like the only two permissible opinions in America are either "the vaccine is poison" or "vaccinate everyone of every age and condition as many times as possible".
You are mistaken about that. I just don't like hypocrisy, and I don't like people who twist facts to fit their own narrative. I see a cripple fight with one group trying to deny any harmful effect of the vaccine, and another trying to justify their refusal to take the vaccine by calling it 'clotshot'.
Newsflash: you don't need to justify anything. If you don't want to take it, that's your choice, and it's to be respected. You don't need to make stuff up.
Yes? Those are people twisting facts to fit their own narrative.
Read it again if you think that, Genghis.