When watching this antivaxx talk by Raymond Obomsawin I get the feeling that this kind of gaslighting has been going on for over 100 years. Dissident 19th century doctors, trying to figure out how the fuck the establishment is creating its basis for widespread vaccination, sound like currentyear me.
Herd immunity came about because they realized the vaccine was toxic to some people and that while they couldn't get the shot, they could still be protected because everyone else could.
The argument for protecting the vulnerable has simply been co-opted by amoral drug cunts.
Polio was almost eradicated because the polio vaccine actually works.
Suppose that they didn't prevent you from getting polio, but did prevent you from being paralyzed by it. Would you say that it works, or not?
We don’t hear about “herd immunity” with these fake vaccines because they blatantly don’t work.
The reason polio is not present is because of herd immunity. Same for other diseases like measles, and that is why there are measles breakouts when the percentage of people not taking these vaccines reaches a certain point.
I believe the authorities have taken the success of the first vaccines and used it to push fake vaccines.
As skeptical as I am of the authorities and the accountability mechanisms, I don't think they would not get away with that. If it's a 'fake vaccine', it would not cause myocarditis in some people, would it? Placebos don't cause myocarditis.
If it reduced the severity of your symptoms I would call it a therapeutic and not a vaccine.
The covid vaccine was known almost immediately to NOT prevent infection (the only thing the initial double blind test actually claimed)
They then pivoted to “well maybe it reduces hospitalizations” - WITHOUT a double blind test to justify this claim.
The ClotShot was confirmed to NOT reduce transmission- easily found by testing the viral load via a PCR test.
What I mean by “fake vaccine” is not some placebo. It is some product that many well intended scientists thought might work. But because of the money involved and the failure of our government it was never stopped nor correctly tested.
It was clear long ago from Pfizer’s and Moderna’s own safety data that the ‘placebo’ was inducing death, of all things. Check this out as a reminder. So maybe the ‘placebo’ was, as I have suspected, empty LNPs and maybe they are doing damage.
There is lack of transparency as to what even constitutes a placebo any more.
Suppose that they didn't prevent you from getting polio, but did prevent you from being paralyzed by it. Would you say that it works, or not?
You're going to have to include a lot more variables before this question even begins to be answerable.
The major ones: what are the odds of getting polio? What are the odds of being paralyzed by polio? What are the odds of being paralyzed by the polio vaccine? What are the odds of dying from the polio vaccine? What are the odds of other types of negative vaccine side effects?
That you would ask such a simplistic question suggests that you haven't even thought about it very much.
They clearly tell you there is a chance of resistance, allergies, and rejection, which is why doctors give them, unlike the clotshot's pharmacy techs and other yahoos. Most vaccines are carefully developed and processed in such a way they don't kill people, but they are still dangerous to some people, especially those of certain blood types and ages. Look up MMR and Japan. The shingles vaccine can trigger it rather than prevent it. The risk, however, is negligible for the vast majority of people.
Then you have companies run by greedy cunts who try to develop their own versions and experiment on kids, the elderly, the poor, the infirm, etc., like Bill Gates, who end up turning what should have been a simple vaccine into crimes against humanity.
With the obvious coverup and lies told by pfizer around these side effects I started to ask for the first time :
How many of these other “vaccines” have much more side effects than stated and are also based off lies like “the vax is better than natural immunity”?
When watching this antivaxx talk by Raymond Obomsawin I get the feeling that this kind of gaslighting has been going on for over 100 years. Dissident 19th century doctors, trying to figure out how the fuck the establishment is creating its basis for widespread vaccination, sound like currentyear me.
Vaccine immunity to polio is better than natural immunity because you don't have to have had polio.
Polio was almost eradicated because the polio vaccine actually works.
We don’t hear about “herd immunity” with these fake vaccines because they blatantly don’t work.
I believe the authorities have taken the success of the first vaccines and used it to push fake vaccines. For profit/kickbacks/career advancement.
Herd immunity came about because they realized the vaccine was toxic to some people and that while they couldn't get the shot, they could still be protected because everyone else could.
The argument for protecting the vulnerable has simply been co-opted by amoral drug cunts.
Like most disease, sanitation did the heavy lifting.
Now, the number one cause of polio in most places is botched vaccination batches.
Suppose that they didn't prevent you from getting polio, but did prevent you from being paralyzed by it. Would you say that it works, or not?
The reason polio is not present is because of herd immunity. Same for other diseases like measles, and that is why there are measles breakouts when the percentage of people not taking these vaccines reaches a certain point.
As skeptical as I am of the authorities and the accountability mechanisms, I don't think they would not get away with that. If it's a 'fake vaccine', it would not cause myocarditis in some people, would it? Placebos don't cause myocarditis.
If it reduced the severity of your symptoms I would call it a therapeutic and not a vaccine.
The covid vaccine was known almost immediately to NOT prevent infection (the only thing the initial double blind test actually claimed)
They then pivoted to “well maybe it reduces hospitalizations” - WITHOUT a double blind test to justify this claim.
The ClotShot was confirmed to NOT reduce transmission- easily found by testing the viral load via a PCR test.
What I mean by “fake vaccine” is not some placebo. It is some product that many well intended scientists thought might work. But because of the money involved and the failure of our government it was never stopped nor correctly tested.
About that...
There is lack of transparency as to what even constitutes a placebo any more.
You're going to have to include a lot more variables before this question even begins to be answerable.
The major ones: what are the odds of getting polio? What are the odds of being paralyzed by polio? What are the odds of being paralyzed by the polio vaccine? What are the odds of dying from the polio vaccine? What are the odds of other types of negative vaccine side effects?
That you would ask such a simplistic question suggests that you haven't even thought about it very much.
They clearly tell you there is a chance of resistance, allergies, and rejection, which is why doctors give them, unlike the clotshot's pharmacy techs and other yahoos. Most vaccines are carefully developed and processed in such a way they don't kill people, but they are still dangerous to some people, especially those of certain blood types and ages. Look up MMR and Japan. The shingles vaccine can trigger it rather than prevent it. The risk, however, is negligible for the vast majority of people.
Then you have companies run by greedy cunts who try to develop their own versions and experiment on kids, the elderly, the poor, the infirm, etc., like Bill Gates, who end up turning what should have been a simple vaccine into crimes against humanity.