Florida bill would stop banks from tracking fun sales https://archive.ph/NcVnS
People are reselling Harry Potter books with JK Rowling's name taken out. https://archive.ph/Yjxts
A hacker reopens an LED company where you can post whatever you want on a board. https://archive.ph/dIbYd
Ubisoft stock is down because of bad sales https://archive.ph/X5JwI
Disney opposes activist investor who is trying to get onto the board https://archive.ph/58D5L
If you want to repost a link for larger discussion, go for it. I just found too many things yesterday.
By removing Rowling's name from HP books and trying to sell them, are they not attempting to sell a new product that violates copyrights?
I would guess so, but others can jump in.
I imagine she would still collect royalties. They still need to purchase the books form the publishers, so she's still getting her money. It's nothing more than an empty flex. It doesn't really do shit.
No because they aren't making new copies. Rebinding is fine especially after some "unrelated" damage.
No, she didn't write them anyway.
Remember when she said that black Hermione could be a thing, but the books clearly call her white? Rowling didn't write the books, she's just a propped up no-talent feminist with friends in the right places.
How can she not remember major details of her own book? Her whole backstory is extremely shady, I'll be vindicated one day.
Even The Simpsons poked at how books like hers are actually written.
That's not how copyright works.