I used to work in HR. If I did today I would definitely throw away resumes with pronouns, if they had social media showing them at a blm rally or something, if they called themselves an activist. People really will put that stuff on resumes so that’s an easy filter
The question is whether the HR workers of today filter for those kind of things, not against. Then again its all an AI doing the first level of filtering, and AI is always being tuned to cater to genetic dead ends.
Social Justice is not about profits. It never has been.
Not to sound like Beanie Man, but "it's complicated." It's not about profit in the conventional "quarterly earnings" sense, but it is about maintaining wealth and power with the use of propaganda. If you think of Hollywood is merely a propaganda arm of a regime, it becomes clear that it doesn't necessarily need to turn a profit by itself.
I used to work in HR. If I did today I would definitely throw away resumes with pronouns, if they had social media showing them at a blm rally or something, if they called themselves an activist. People really will put that stuff on resumes so that’s an easy filter
The question is whether the HR workers of today filter for those kind of things, not against. Then again its all an AI doing the first level of filtering, and AI is always being tuned to cater to genetic dead ends.
Sounds like a monarchist.
Not complaining--there's a reason "designed by committee" is an insult. Too many cooks spoil the broth.
Plus I could use more monarchist lines for something I'm working on.
Not to sound like Beanie Man, but "it's complicated." It's not about profit in the conventional "quarterly earnings" sense, but it is about maintaining wealth and power with the use of propaganda. If you think of Hollywood is merely a propaganda arm of a regime, it becomes clear that it doesn't necessarily need to turn a profit by itself.