I'm unsurprised. On my community, me and another user were predicting that the "groomer" movement would eventually spin away from the schools when it came to the ultimatum of confronting women's influence on kids.
They don't have the spine to stand up to women, so they pivot away from it to a cheap target that actually helps women gain even more fucking power.
me and another user were predicting that the "groomer" movement would eventually spin away from the schools when it came to the ultimatum of confronting women's influence on kids.
This is not the groomer movement.
They don't have the spine to stand up to women
An invertebrate has spine enough to "stand up to women".
Republicans saying they're going to protect kids, with the backing of Fox News, Josh "just get married, ruin your life for me" Hawley and the Democrats (shh, we can't say that one) sounds like that's the establishment taking control of that narrative to direct it away from the favored class.
If there's an issue with kids coming out fucked up, you know exactly where to look, and they know it too, hence this misdirection featuring the same shill who blocked drafting the [deleted for Rule 16]s who are gleefully profiting from the war on Ukraine.
The rest of the industry is built on advertising revenue, a forced CC to register will mean that most of their clicks will just disappear. It's likely most studios would collapse, making OF the sole option and giving women 100% control of the industry.
I still can't believe the depths of amoral behaviors women go to. The whole hiring people for next to nothing in Venezuela because the USD is so valuable to them, just to groom simps into fake relationships to maximize the woman's wealth...it's fucking sick. They're not just exploiting the broken men they produce, they're exploiting people in destroyed countries to do their dirty work because they can't even bring themselves to talk to the people they're exploiting. Not because they'd feel remorse, they wouldn't, but because they can't even pretend to care about these people themselves.
This bill is just a clever ploy by women's plants in the GOP to further entrench the system they created to exploit the broken men the education system they run produces. Mike Lee was the same woman worshipping cuckold that blocked drafting them.
The male owner hired them and could fire them. Like I told you, pornography enriches shitty people like Leo who have no compunction about exploiting men to enrich themselves. You're defending the "honor" of a skeezy pornographer who would sell your kidneys for a nickel.
You really don't know how OnlyFans works. What you're suggesting would be like Apple firing developers from their app store. It's possible, but it doesn't help them at all.
OnlyFans is a platform. The owner makes the most money if they (there are multiple owners, of which 25% of shares are held by an undisclosed party.) just step back and let the women run it, getting their cut of the revenue.
people who exploit men for money
And you're defending women, who do it because it's fun. What's your point? I'm not defending the guy, but look what women turned Twitch into. If he didn't run it, someone else would. Their predatory tactics are not going to disappear because you locked up the guy who happened to run the site. They'll just make their own, even more exploitative version. That's why the issue ends with them. Because it can't exist without them being amoral, exploitative trash.
I remember when your side used to call the traditional porn industry exploitative and got all the feminist trash to back you. How did that go? Seems like the sleazy producers were actually holding back a great evil, that you went and enabled.
The jews in Israel
It's not even bait, he just threw the hook in the water.
You're surprised that social conservatives do not like pornography when it's accessible to kids?
I'm unsurprised. On my community, me and another user were predicting that the "groomer" movement would eventually spin away from the schools when it came to the ultimatum of confronting women's influence on kids.
They don't have the spine to stand up to women, so they pivot away from it to a cheap target that actually helps women gain even more fucking power.
This is not the groomer movement.
An invertebrate has spine enough to "stand up to women".
Republicans saying they're going to protect kids, with the backing of Fox News, Josh "just get married, ruin your life for me" Hawley and
the Democrats(shh, we can't say that one) sounds like that's the establishment taking control of that narrative to direct it away from the favored class.And yet nobody ever does.
The majority of teachers are female.
If there's an issue with kids coming out fucked up, you know exactly where to look, and they know it too, hence this misdirection featuring the same shill who blocked drafting the [deleted for Rule 16]s who are gleefully profiting from the war on Ukraine.
Hypergamy makes it seem like it, yes
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amrapali_Gan
Coincidentally, also the only company that would be wholly unaffected.
Leo still owns OF. How is it that OF won't be affected? I haven't looked into the details of this bill.
OF already requires a credit card to sign up.
The rest of the industry is built on advertising revenue, a forced CC to register will mean that most of their clicks will just disappear. It's likely most studios would collapse, making OF the sole option and giving women 100% control of the industry.
I still can't believe the depths of amoral behaviors women go to. The whole hiring people for next to nothing in Venezuela because the USD is so valuable to them, just to groom simps into fake relationships to maximize the woman's wealth...it's fucking sick. They're not just exploiting the broken men they produce, they're exploiting people in destroyed countries to do their dirty work because they can't even bring themselves to talk to the people they're exploiting. Not because they'd feel remorse, they wouldn't, but because they can't even pretend to care about these people themselves.
This bill is just a clever ploy by women's plants in the GOP to further entrench the system they created to exploit the broken men the education system they run produces. Mike Lee was the same woman worshipping cuckold that blocked drafting them.
The owner of OF is a man, you idiot.
But the power rests with women. They make the content, they run the policy of the company, they lead the board.
Don't try to deflect for your favorite people, it's sickening.
The male owner hired them and could fire them. Like I told you, pornography enriches shitty people like Leo who have no compunction about exploiting men to enrich themselves. You're defending the "honor" of a skeezy pornographer who would sell your kidneys for a nickel.
You really don't know how OnlyFans works. What you're suggesting would be like Apple firing developers from their app store. It's possible, but it doesn't help them at all.
OnlyFans is a platform. The owner makes the most money if they (there are multiple owners, of which 25% of shares are held by an undisclosed party.) just step back and let the women run it, getting their cut of the revenue.
And you're defending women, who do it because it's fun. What's your point? I'm not defending the guy, but look what women turned Twitch into. If he didn't run it, someone else would. Their predatory tactics are not going to disappear because you locked up the guy who happened to run the site. They'll just make their own, even more exploitative version. That's why the issue ends with them. Because it can't exist without them being amoral, exploitative trash.
I remember when your side used to call the traditional porn industry exploitative and got all the feminist trash to back you. How did that go? Seems like the sleazy producers were actually holding back a great evil, that you went and enabled.
Both of those people are dead. What the fuck are you talking about?
Your argument actually makes them sound good, the industry got much more predatory under women's direct control.