The male owner hired them and could fire them. Like I told you, pornography enriches shitty people like Leo who have no compunction about exploiting men to enrich themselves. You're defending the "honor" of a skeezy pornographer who would sell your kidneys for a nickel.
You really don't know how OnlyFans works. What you're suggesting would be like Apple firing developers from their app store. It's possible, but it doesn't help them at all.
OnlyFans is a platform. The owner makes the most money if they (there are multiple owners, of which 25% of shares are held by an undisclosed party.) just step back and let the women run it, getting their cut of the revenue.
people who exploit men for money
And you're defending women, who do it because it's fun. What's your point? I'm not defending the guy, but look what women turned Twitch into. If he didn't run it, someone else would. Their predatory tactics are not going to disappear because you locked up the guy who happened to run the site. They'll just make their own, even more exploitative version. That's why the issue ends with them. Because it can't exist without them being amoral, exploitative trash.
I remember when your side used to call the traditional porn industry exploitative and got all the feminist trash to back you. How did that go? Seems like the sleazy producers were actually holding back a great evil, that you went and enabled.
The sleazy porn producers never went away, you fucking idiot. The anti-porn crusaders of previous decades failed. OF exists because they failed, and you are framing them as the problem. You don't make any sense.
The owner of OF is a man, you idiot.
But the power rests with women. They make the content, they run the policy of the company, they lead the board.
Don't try to deflect for your favorite people, it's sickening.
The male owner hired them and could fire them. Like I told you, pornography enriches shitty people like Leo who have no compunction about exploiting men to enrich themselves. You're defending the "honor" of a skeezy pornographer who would sell your kidneys for a nickel.
You really don't know how OnlyFans works. What you're suggesting would be like Apple firing developers from their app store. It's possible, but it doesn't help them at all.
OnlyFans is a platform. The owner makes the most money if they (there are multiple owners, of which 25% of shares are held by an undisclosed party.) just step back and let the women run it, getting their cut of the revenue.
And you're defending women, who do it because it's fun. What's your point? I'm not defending the guy, but look what women turned Twitch into. If he didn't run it, someone else would. Their predatory tactics are not going to disappear because you locked up the guy who happened to run the site. They'll just make their own, even more exploitative version. That's why the issue ends with them. Because it can't exist without them being amoral, exploitative trash.
I remember when your side used to call the traditional porn industry exploitative and got all the feminist trash to back you. How did that go? Seems like the sleazy producers were actually holding back a great evil, that you went and enabled.
The sleazy porn producers never went away, you fucking idiot. The anti-porn crusaders of previous decades failed. OF exists because they failed, and you are framing them as the problem. You don't make any sense.