The article says Pavone posted a video with the body of an aborted baby on an altar. Pavone denies it was a consecrated altar, so it is not a desecration of the altar (which is what makes the video blasphemous). He confirms the body is real, entrusted to him for burial.
“blasphemous communications on social media.”
what were they?
The article says Pavone posted a video with the body of an aborted baby on an altar. Pavone denies it was a consecrated altar, so it is not a desecration of the altar (which is what makes the video blasphemous). He confirms the body is real, entrusted to him for burial.
That is kind of odd. I wouldn't say it is blasphemous, however.
I don't know.