If we have no leaders who is going to hold any sort of office? Political positions need to be filled by individual human beings. The right simply needs to gatekeep more and gatekeep better. We can absolutely do better than a gay black bipolar rapper, a gay jewish grifter, and a gay mexican catboy enthusiast.
Or, hear me out. We find leaders that aren't "anyone willing to give us a crumb of attention." And then stop deifying them into a cultish fever when we do.
Milo only got as far as he did because GG was filled with Leftists who desperately wanted A Shield to pretend they weren't the racist/homophobic/sexist. He was a gay "not GOP" name, so he was immediately elevated to high status.
And, like is so often the case, of the dozens of those the diverse one gets all the accolades and support well beyond their actual merit.
He was also openly manipulating GG by his own admission, and stole a shit ton of money. But everyone still made excuses for him until he got 'cancelled' by the Right itself.
Bad idea. That's the next notion that keeps you without direction. While not leaders per se there needs to those at the font of the formation getting the message out.
"No Leaders" diatribe is the infiltrators keeping the message from solidifying and allows outsiders to set your narrative. Look how they were the ones that set the tone for how Gamergate is seen than what it is.
If we have no leaders who is going to hold any sort of office? Political positions need to be filled by individual human beings. The right simply needs to gatekeep more and gatekeep better. We can absolutely do better than a gay black bipolar rapper, a gay jewish grifter, and a gay mexican catboy enthusiast.
Or, hear me out. We find leaders that aren't "anyone willing to give us a crumb of attention." And then stop deifying them into a cultish fever when we do.
Milo only got as far as he did because GG was filled with Leftists who desperately wanted A Shield to pretend they weren't the racist/homophobic/sexist. He was a gay "not GOP" name, so he was immediately elevated to high status.
He also got as far as he did because he's entertaining and charismatic. Don't underestimate people.
And, like is so often the case, of the dozens of those the diverse one gets all the accolades and support well beyond their actual merit.
He was also openly manipulating GG by his own admission, and stole a shit ton of money. But everyone still made excuses for him until he got 'cancelled' by the Right itself.
Lauren Southern is right about Milo.
Bad idea. That's the next notion that keeps you without direction. While not leaders per se there needs to those at the font of the formation getting the message out.
"No Leaders" diatribe is the infiltrators keeping the message from solidifying and allows outsiders to set your narrative. Look how they were the ones that set the tone for how Gamergate is seen than what it is.