Time to revisit the Rotherham cases...again. We already know they were burying genuine male victims, what's pushing fake female "victims" to them?
Grooming gangs = biggest hoax in British history. Just designed to make race cucks go full simp over "our precious white girls" rather than demanding Conservatives do something against women.
I wasn't defending anything. I was merely inferring that if they think they can get away with such obvious hoaxes, how many actually did because they covered the lie a bit better?
Your own link mentioned cases of women that were buried. When that was pointed out to you, you fled just like you did when your lies about Kyle Rittenhouse were exposed.
It was The Guardian, I'm not sure what you expect. The only time they'll report accurately on women is when they can race bait. Otherwise they'll bury some likely fake story about female victims near the end to stop someone having the wrong emotions towards women.
Can't have the slaves feeling too strongly about Massa.
Question: why do you say this? It’s literally in the Koran that Muslims have the ability to do this shit to non-Muslim women without repercussion from other Muslims, so it’s not that farfetched.
Who could have imagined that this turned out to be fake?
By the way, how come she is being prosecuted for this? I thought you said women get off even for murder?
They do. Amusingly, she would have been better off killing them under the UK's laws than this obvious fraud.
Time to revisit the Rotherham cases...again. We already know they were burying genuine male victims, what's pushing fake female "victims" to them?
Grooming gangs = biggest hoax in British history. Just designed to make race cucks go full simp over "our precious white girls" rather than demanding Conservatives do something against women.
+0.12 shekel
+10 good boy points for being a good little simp. I heard if you get a million, master will send you her nude pics.
0.03 shekel
+20 good boy points! If you work at it for a decade, you might make enough!
In this conversation, you make the Stormfags look sane, moral and decent.
That's impossible, they are none of those things. Just like their masters.
Here they are, because Simpossible is defending rape gangs.
I wasn't defending anything. I was merely inferring that if they think they can get away with such obvious hoaxes, how many actually did because they covered the lie a bit better?
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: "simp" is not a slur.
You made that claim before, I refuted it, and then you shut up about it... for a while.
The Imp: a rape gang's best friend.
You didn't refute it, you just said "there's no proof of a conspiracy because one case was buried"
Oh, I remember.
Your own link mentioned cases of women that were buried. When that was pointed out to you, you fled just like you did when your lies about Kyle Rittenhouse were exposed.
It was The Guardian, I'm not sure what you expect. The only time they'll report accurately on women is when they can race bait. Otherwise they'll bury some likely fake story about female victims near the end to stop someone having the wrong emotions towards women.
Can't have the slaves feeling too strongly about Massa.
I'm flattered that you think we're a large and important enough political force to be worthy of this sort of manipulation. The feeling is not mutual.
Question: why do you say this? It’s literally in the Koran that Muslims have the ability to do this shit to non-Muslim women without repercussion from other Muslims, so it’s not that farfetched.