🚨 🤡 🌎 🚨
(i.redd.it)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Who shall we trust to report them?
So just make stuff up?
I'd say there's a vast difference between speculation about hypothesis to fit the facts vs. just making shit up and passing it off as unquestionable reality.
This is not presented as a hypothesis. This is just stuff that's made up, as far as I can see, and presented as fact.
It’s also, as far as you or anyone else can see, a plausible explanation for the known facts:
-The Pelosis are great friends with long time meth-abuser and callboy-murderer Ed Buck
-This man, despite any logically present security, was able to enter the house of the third in line to the president = odd, he was allowed in is a logical assumption
-A third unnamed man opened the door (from the INSIDE) for the police. Who tf is this third person? Bodyguard who was told to take a walk while his boss got freaky? = odd, instantly suspicious
-during a “home invasion”, the victim was allowed to “go to the bathroom, where he called police from his phone... which was charging in the bathroom... which he had been allowed to enter”... odd
-initial reports were that upon being admitted to the house, police found both the “assailant” and the “victim” in their underwear, this is now being memory holed... odd
Why is it so unimaginable that some rando in the SFPD leaked this after interrogation began?
Anyway, I guess we’ll see.
It’s what they do. Why do you find this any less reputable than the proven liars in the mainstream media?
Cause I don't trust them, and I don't trust randos on their say so either.