No it wasn't. That shit was a side show compared to the fact that the Socialist government blew up the economy, that the Russians had invaded in the 1920's and caused a communist insurrection in Berlin to support the invasion, and that the "Hunger Chancellor" who actually fixed the economy had cut programs that the predominantly socialist people of Germany thought they should still be able to have.
The National Socialists biggest argument was that they were a complete alternative, almost centrist, party that would keep the benefits of Socialism, Progressive Nationalism, and institutionalize the Volkish movement (which was an ahistorical revisionism of German history into myth).
The degeneracy of Berlin was just that: Berlin being weird. What most Germans didn't like were the Berliners blowing up the economy and supporting a Russian invasion. The germans liked the 'benefits' of Socialism because they were under the impression that a socialist society was an inherently advanced society, but for some unknowable reason, their economy kept dying. So, they wanted an alternative to Communism, and Democratic Socialism, and evil-backwards-reactionary-thinking Capitalism that all the experts thought would be a really good idea. Well, they found it.
The National Socialists biggest argument was that they were a complete alternative, almost centrist, party that would keep the benefits of Socialism, Progressive Nationalism, and institutionalize the Volkish movement (which was an ahistorical revisionism of German history into myth).
I hate using the word Centrist because it doesn't make sense in a modern context. They were explicitly a revolutionary party, but they saw themselves as an "all of the good parts" middle-ground between Communism and Capitalism.
Modern connotations of centrism implies that they would have been anti-revolutionary or reformist, but they were openly revolutionary. Hell, it's why they dissolved the constitution, and pledged to due so in their elections.
Their own description of "third way" is actually more apt than "centrist". The framing doesn't make sense objectively, but if you're a socialist who accepts a pure political binary between Communism and Capitalism, it does.
Wasn't part of the reason for the growth in Nazism in Germany was because of the degeneracy that was happening to the point you had child prostitution
So how about you stop being such open degenerates demanding public attention, and then you don't have to fear a huge backlash and camps?
No it wasn't. That shit was a side show compared to the fact that the Socialist government blew up the economy, that the Russians had invaded in the 1920's and caused a communist insurrection in Berlin to support the invasion, and that the "Hunger Chancellor" who actually fixed the economy had cut programs that the predominantly socialist people of Germany thought they should still be able to have.
The National Socialists biggest argument was that they were a complete alternative, almost centrist, party that would keep the benefits of Socialism, Progressive Nationalism, and institutionalize the Volkish movement (which was an ahistorical revisionism of German history into myth).
The degeneracy of Berlin was just that: Berlin being weird. What most Germans didn't like were the Berliners blowing up the economy and supporting a Russian invasion. The germans liked the 'benefits' of Socialism because they were under the impression that a socialist society was an inherently advanced society, but for some unknowable reason, their economy kept dying. So, they wanted an alternative to Communism, and Democratic Socialism, and evil-backwards-reactionary-thinking Capitalism that all the experts thought would be a really good idea. Well, they found it.
This is correct. Here is their 25 point plan
I hate using the word Centrist because it doesn't make sense in a modern context. They were explicitly a revolutionary party, but they saw themselves as an "all of the good parts" middle-ground between Communism and Capitalism.
Modern connotations of centrism implies that they would have been anti-revolutionary or reformist, but they were openly revolutionary. Hell, it's why they dissolved the constitution, and pledged to due so in their elections.
Their own description of "third way" is actually more apt than "centrist". The framing doesn't make sense objectively, but if you're a socialist who accepts a pure political binary between Communism and Capitalism, it does.