By definition, mutilation is a disfiguring wound. Circumcision is literally that, on a genital.
Can men not get raped either because the "better known" version is penis forced into vagina? Not be victims of domestic abuse because the "better known" version is drunk husband physically hitting a woman?
I don't like circumcision either. It's also NOT the same as the better-known genital mutilation, which is what happens to little girls in the Middle East, rendering them unable to get aroused AT ALL.
Why would it need to be 'the same' to be referred to as mutilation? Mutilation is mutilation.
By definition, mutilation is a disfiguring wound. Circumcision is literally that, on a genital.
Can men not get raped either because the "better known" version is penis forced into vagina? Not be victims of domestic abuse because the "better known" version is drunk husband physically hitting a woman?
Why would it need to be 'the same' to be referred to as mutilation? Mutilation is mutilation.
Hey look, a circumcision NPC. Haven't run into one of those in a while.
He's not an NPC when he acknowledges that he doesn't like it. And even if he were, what's the point of just throwing an insult in someone's direction?